Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 13, 2014·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Arizona Coyotes 3, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 89% of the time.

CGY winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI172808323
CGY11031114525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:06CGYPaul ByronAssists: Sven Baertschi · Backhand, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:43ARIShane DoanAssists: Antoine Vermette, Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:03CGYPaul ByronAssists: Sven Baertschi, Kris Russell · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:35CGYSean MonahanAssists: Curtis Glencross, David Jones · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:58ARIAntoine VermettePPAssists: Shane Doan, Mikkel Boedker · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:54ARIJoe VitaleAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, B.J. Crombeen · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:23CGYMark GiordanoGWGAssists: TJ Brodie, Jiri Hudler · Snap, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:23CGYDavid JonesUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:55ARILauri Korpikoski: Holding2 min
  2. P1 8:10CGYDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 8:10ARIB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:20ARISam Gagner: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 8:20CGYJosh Jooris: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:32CGYCurtis Glencross: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 15:32ARIKeith Yandle: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 14:27ARIMartin Hanzal: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hanzal won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARICGY
23Shots on goal25
1.3Expected goals3.7
52Shot attempts61
32Faceoffs won30
1Power plays3
13Penalty minutes9
16Hits20
19Blocked shots18
10Giveaways8
10Takeaways19

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Korpikoski – Boedker5:18

    xG 0.31–0.02 (94%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Crombeen – Vitale – Klinkhammer4:23

    xG 0.26–0.01 (95%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  3. Doan – Gagner – Rieder6:36

    xG 0.21–0.26 (45%)attempts 4–7goals 0–2

  4. Chipchura – Korpikoski – Gagner4:42

    xG 0.05–0.10 (33%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Ekman-Larsson17:33

    xG 0.48–0.23 (67%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Schlemko – Stone11:58

    xG 0.48–0.32 (60%)attempts 14–6goals 1–1

  3. Yandle – Murphy16:07

    xG 0.22–1.23 (15%)attempts 14–16goals 0–3

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Glencross – Monahan13:23

    xG 1.07–0.31 (78%)attempts 14–10goals 2–0

  2. Byron – Baertschi – Jooris8:17

    xG 0.37–0.29 (56%)attempts 7–7goals 2–1

  3. McGrattan – Bouma – Reinhart5:25

    xG 0.14–0.12 (54%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Hudler – Gaudreau – Granlund9:53

    xG 0.10–0.31 (24%)attempts 3–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Smid11:05

    xG 0.56–0.09 (86%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Giordano – Brodie16:15

    xG 0.82–0.41 (67%)attempts 14–11goals 1–1

  3. Wideman – Russell18:10

    xG 0.58–0.60 (49%)attempts 10–22goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.7 xGARI 1.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #217 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.70 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 89% of the time.

CGY winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).