Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 11, 2014·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Calgary Flames 3, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 80% of the time.

BUF winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY011216118345
BUF062627419

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:34BUFMatt MoulsonAssists: Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:31CGYMark GiordanoPPAssists: Dennis Wideman, Jiri Hudler · Slap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:41BUFMarcus FolignoAssists: Drew Stafford, Nicolas Deslauriers · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:06CGYDavid JonesAssists: Curtis Glencross, Josh Jooris · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:14CGYSean MonahanAssists: Joe Colborne · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:59BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Tyler Ennis, Josh Gorges · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:31BUFMatt MoulsonGWGAssists: Tyler Ennis, Zemgus Girgensons · Deflected, 0.13 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:20BUFJosh Gorges: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:57CGYMark Giordano: Interference2 min
  3. P2 1:51CGYTJ Brodie: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 2:31BUFTyler Ennis: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 9:59BUFChris Stewart: Fighting5 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:59CGYBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 11:01BUFMarcus Foligno: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 11:13BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Monahan won the faceoff against Girgensons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYBUF
45Shots on goal19
2.8Expected goals1.2
76Shot attempts36
32Faceoffs won38
4Power plays2
9Penalty minutes13
12Hits17
9Blocked shots21
4Giveaways8
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestByron – Colborne – Monahan12:18

    xG 0.46–0.13 (77%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Hudler – Gaudreau – Jooris6:16

    xG 0.31–0.10 (76%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Hudler – Gaudreau – Granlund5:10

    xG 0.21–0.01 (94%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Glencross – Granlund3:34

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWideman – Russell16:28

    xG 0.79–0.16 (83%)attempts 21–9goals 0–0

  2. Engelland – Diaz7:40

    xG 0.34–0.16 (68%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  3. Wideman – Giordano2:15

    xG 0.06–0.12 (34%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Ennis – Girgensons15:23

    xG 0.62–0.45 (58%)attempts 14–13goals 3–0

  2. McCormick – Kaleta – Deslauriers4:05

    xG 0.13–0.09 (59%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Stewart – Foligno11:59

    xG 0.07–0.28 (20%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Mitchell – Flynn12:29

    xG 0.14–0.36 (29%)attempts 8–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Benoit – Weber12:49

    xG 0.27–0.26 (51%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Zadorov14:00

    xG 0.30–0.58 (34%)attempts 7–17goals 1–0

  3. Gorges – Myers18:40

    xG 0.37–0.77 (33%)attempts 15–17goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.2 xGCGY 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #125 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 80% of the time.

BUF winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).