Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 15, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Minnesota Wild 7, Buffalo Sabres 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN215312210737
BUF0301005018

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:13MINZach PariseGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu, Jason Pominville · Deflected, 0.34 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:01MINThomas VanekPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Jason Pominville · Slap, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:00MINKyle BrodziakSHAssists: Erik Haula · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–0
  4. P2 9:06MINMathew DumbaAssists: Jason Pominville, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.02 xG4–0
  5. P2 18:54MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Jonathon Blum, Ryan Carter · Slap, 0.01 xG5–0
  6. P3 4:26MINMatt CookeAssists: Kyle Brodziak · Deflected, 0.05 xG6–0
  7. P3 18:27MINErik HaulaPPAssists: Thomas Vanek, Christian Folin · Snap, 0.08 xG7–0
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:11BUFTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 7:42MINThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 16:56BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:56MINMathew Dumba: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 18:12BUFMike Weber: Holding2 min
  6. P2 4:59MINJason Zucker: Interference2 min
  7. P2 11:09MINJared Spurgeon: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 19:32BUFJosh Gorges: Holding2 min
  9. P3 6:27BUFTyler Myers: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 10:28BUFPatrick Kaleta: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 16:45BUFChris Stewart: Elbowing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Haula won the faceoff against Girgensons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBUF
37Shots on goal18
4.2Expected goals2.1
63Shot attempts44
34Faceoffs won25
6Power plays3
11Penalty minutes17
12Hits30
15Blocked shots18
5Giveaways8
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Pominville – Parise10:38

    xG 1.47–0.08 (95%)attempts 13–4goals 2–0

  2. Vanek – Haula – Zucker7:44

    xG 0.82–0.30 (73%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Coyle – Niederreiter8:43

    xG 0.15–0.32 (32%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Cooke – Brodziak – Fontaine10:35

    xG 0.15–0.50 (23%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Dumba6:53

    xG 1.54–0.16 (91%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  2. Spurgeon – Prosser4:32

    xG 0.79–0.18 (81%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba2:32

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Stewart – Hodgson – Deslauriers3:19

    xG 0.07–0.04 (65%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Stafford – Mitchell – Flynn9:39

    xG 0.08–0.09 (46%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  3. Ellis – Kaleta – Deslauriers3:35

    xG 0.00–0.54 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons12:08

    xG 0.38–0.94 (29%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gorges – Myers12:40

    xG 0.08–0.18 (30%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Zadorov16:33

    xG 0.71–1.11 (39%)attempts 20–13goals 0–0

  3. Meszaros – Weber11:49

    xG 0.29–0.73 (28%)attempts 9–12goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.1 xGMIN 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 7/100 · #1135 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).