Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 28, 2015·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Detroit Red Wings 4, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 62% of the time.

NSH winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET1101827425
NSH09316015340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:22DETBrendan SmithAssists: Joakim Andersson, Drew Miller · Snap, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:03DETDrew MillerAssists: Tomas Jurco · Snap, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:33NSHMatt CullenAssists: Craig Smith, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:02NSHMike FisherAssists: Cody Franson, Matt Cullen · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:08NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Roman Josi · Slap, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:56DETAlexey MarchenkoAssists: Justin Abdelkader, Niklas Kronwall · Snap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 9:06DETTomas TatarPPGWGAssists: Pavel Datsyuk, Niklas Kronwall · Backhand, 0.10 xG4–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 19:58DETLuke Glendening: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 19:58NSHMike Ribeiro: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 8:17DETJakub Kindl: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 11:28NSHRoman Josi: Interference2 min
  5. P2 14:11DETTomas Tatar: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  6. P2 14:11NSHColin Wilson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 15:16DETBrendan Smith: Holding2 min
  8. P3 2:02DETBrendan Smith: Interference2 min
  9. P3 2:02NSHFilip Forsberg: Embellishment2 min
  10. P3 8:07NSHMike Fisher: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 9:42NSHJames Neal: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 13:57DETBrendan Smith: Interference2 min
  13. P3 17:17DETRiley Sheahan: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 19:37NSHJames Neal: Slashing2 min
  15. P3 19:50NSHPekka Rinne: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← DET attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Datsyuk
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETNSH
25Shots on goal40
1.9Expected goals2.4
51Shot attempts57
35Faceoffs won30
5Power plays4
14Penalty minutes16
15Hits22
9Blocked shots15
9Giveaways8
10Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. Weiss – Andersson – Pulkkinen3:12

    xG 0.11–0.06 (64%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Datsyuk – Helm – Tatar2:41

    xG 0.02–0.02 (49%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Datsyuk – Abdelkader – Tatar5:50

    xG 0.06–0.06 (47%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Miller – Jurco – Glendening6:29

    xG 0.08–0.12 (41%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Ericsson12:54

    xG 0.51–0.24 (68%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Smith – DeKeyser13:05

    xG 0.43–0.37 (54%)attempts 14–10goals 1–2

  3. Kindl – Marchenko9:43

    xG 0.16–0.46 (25%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Neal – Forsberg11:23

    xG 0.59–0.38 (61%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0

  2. Santorelli – Wilson – Jarnkrok7:18

    xG 0.25–0.14 (65%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Fisher – Smith8:22

    xG 0.26–0.27 (48%)attempts 7–8goals 2–0

  4. Gaustad – Nystrom – Bourque7:55

    xG 0.05–0.07 (40%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFranson – Ekholm13:54

    xG 0.65–0.08 (88%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  2. Weber – Josi15:40

    xG 0.39–0.13 (76%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

  3. Bartley – Jones7:26

    xG 0.16–0.51 (24%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.4 xGDET 1.9 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #175 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.04 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 62% of the time.

NSH winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).