- Age
- 42
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 188 cm
- Weight
- 83 kg
- Born
- Dover, USA
- Draft
- 2003, round 6, #186 (ANA)
Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17
- Games
- 518
- Goals
- 56
- Points
- 107
- TOI per game
- 12:47
- xGF% (5v5)
- 49.0%
- Goals above expected
- −7.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   TBL | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3 | 12:14 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.7 | – |
| 2009–10 |   DET | 66 | 10 | 9 | 19 | +5 | 12:42 | 93 | 10.8% | 4 | 9.4 | – |
| 2009–10 | All teams | 80 | 10 | 9 | 19 | +2 | 12:37 | 103 | 9.7% | 4 | 10.1 | – |
| 2010–11 | DET | 67 | 10 | 8 | 18 | −2 | 11:45 | 85 | 11.8% | 0 | 9.2 | 54.5% |
| 2011–12 | DET | 80 | 14 | 11 | 25 | +6 | 12:52 | 131 | 10.7% | 0 | 11.4 | 53.3% |
| 2012–13 | DET | 44 | 4 | 4 | 8 | −8 | 13:49 | 54 | 7.4% | 1 | 6.3 | 47.6% |
| 2013–14 | DET | 82 | 7 | 8 | 15 | −11 | 14:08 | 117 | 6.0% | 0 | 11.9 | 50.5% |
| 2014–15 | DET | 82 | 5 | 8 | 13 | −3 | 13:26 | 98 | 5.1% | 1 | 8.6 | 44.9% |
| 2015–16 | DET | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −5 | 12:58 | 27 | 3.7% | 0 | 2.4 | 41.0% |
| 2016–17 | DET | 55 | 5 | 2 | 7 | −12 | 10:17 | 43 | 11.6% | 0 | 3.9 | 42.9% |
| Total | 2 teams | 518 | 56 | 51 | 107 | −33 | 12:47 | 658 | 8.5% | 6 | 63.8 | 49.0% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
22nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.5133rd pct
- Assists /600.4612th pct
- ixG /600.5831st pct
- Goals above expected−7.817th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)49.0%49th pct
- CF% (5v5)48.1%39th pct
- Relative xGF%−3.229th pct
- Penalty diff /600.1456th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game12:4742nd pct
- PP time share1.7%15th pct
- Offensive zone starts39.9%14th pct
- Quality of competition23.1%17th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Miller wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2016–17, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1539+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
30.9%
42–94 · below the 1539 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
31.3%
Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.
Wins above average
−25
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.4
136 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone32.3% 20–42
- Neutral zone31.4% 11–24
- Defensive zone28.2% 11–28
By strength
- Even strength33.7% 29–57
- Power play0.0% 0–1
- Shorthanded26.5% 13–36
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +17 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.7 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Kyle Chipchura37.5% 3–5
- Saku Koivu25.0% 1–3
- Boyd Gordon0.0% 0–4
- Patrik Berglund33.3% 1–2
- Matt Cullen66.7% 2–1
- Scott Nichol33.3% 1–2
- Gregory Campbell0.0% 0–3
- Derick Brassard33.3% 1–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 43 | 32.6% | 32.4% |
| 2010–11 | 17 | 23.5% | 24.1% |
| 2011–12 | 25 | 20.0% | 20.6% |
| 2012–13 | 4 | 25.0% | 29.4% |
| 2013–14 | 23 | 39.1% | 38.6% |
| 2014–15 | 19 | 31.6% | 34.1% |
| 2015–16 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.5% |
| 2016–17 | 3 | 66.7% | 62.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−7.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games