Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 7, 2015·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Vancouver Canucks 3, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11511019334
SJS215013012240

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:58SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.41 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:51SJSJoe ThorntonPPAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:21VANRadim VrbataAssists: Nick Bonino, Daniel Sedin · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:24VANBo HorvatUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:21VANRadim VrbataPPGWGAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:05SJSBrenden Dillon: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:05VANJannik Hansen: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:05VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 2:05SJSJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 2:05SJSBrenden Dillon: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 8:25SJSTomas Hertl: High sticking2 min
  7. P1 11:07VANLuca Sbisa: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 6:48VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 11:47SJSMirco Mueller: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 3:34VANNick Bonino: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 3:34SJSMelker Karlsson: Roughing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 5:13SJSBrent Burns: High sticking2 min
  13. P3 19:51SJSTomas Hertl: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSJS
34Shots on goal40
2.6Expected goals3.9
66Shot attempts72
27Faceoffs won39
5Power plays2
13Penalty minutes19
26Hits26
17Blocked shots22
24Giveaways9
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Matthias – Bonino10:13

    xG 0.59–0.22 (73%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  2. Hansen – Dorsett – Horvat10:08

    xG 0.37–0.40 (48%)attempts 6–14goals 1–0

  3. Burrows – McMillan – Vey6:52

    xG 0.13–0.20 (40%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Kassian10:58

    xG 0.20–1.25 (14%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Sbisa13:26

    xG 0.84–0.52 (62%)attempts 18–10goals 2–0

  2. Edler – Sbisa4:43

    xG 0.05–0.05 (49%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Clendening2:51

    xG 0.07–0.12 (36%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Karlsson13:27

    xG 1.00–0.22 (82%)attempts 25–7goals 1–1

  2. Scott – Goodrow – Tierney4:38

    xG 0.22–0.04 (86%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Wingels – Nieto3:37

    xG 0.24–0.11 (69%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Marleau – Couture – Nieto8:22

    xG 0.53–0.48 (52%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – Mueller10:01

    xG 0.83–0.04 (95%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Braun13:51

    xG 1.06–0.44 (70%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  3. Hannan – Burns10:27

    xG 0.34–0.43 (44%)attempts 12–11goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.9 xGVAN 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #391 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).