Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 9, 2015·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Nashville Predators 2, Arizona Coyotes 1 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

ARI winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH0131801217240
ARI090111800128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:26NSHPaul GaustadAssists: Taylor Beck · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P3 7:27ARIKyle ChipchuraPPAssists: John Moore, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. OT 2:45NSHJames NealGWGAssists: Seth Jones, Cody Franson · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 3:31ARIBrandon Gormley: Holding2 min
  2. P1 5:01ARIMichael Stone: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 5:38NSHMike Ribeiro: Holding2 min
  4. P1 12:44ARIDavid Moss: Elbowing2 min
  5. P1 19:04NSHJames Neal: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 3:02NSHMike Fisher: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 3:02ARIB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 9:12NSHPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 9:12ARIKyle Chipchura: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 4:49NSHJames Neal: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  11. P3 12:13ARISam Gagner: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 12:13NSHGabriel Bourque: Embellishment2 min
  13. P3 14:21ARIKlas Dahlbeck: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  14. P3 18:37ARIDavid Moss: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Chipchura won the faceoff against Ribeiro
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHARI
40Shots on goal28
3.2Expected goals2.3
80Shot attempts68
28Faceoffs won39
5Power plays4
20Penalty minutes22
46Hits32
20Blocked shots16
5Giveaways4
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Neal – Forsberg2:45

    xG 0.23–0.01 (94%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  2. Ribeiro – Smith – Forsberg7:22

    xG 0.17–0.03 (87%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Santorelli – Stalberg10:16

    xG 0.33–0.22 (59%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  4. Gaustad – Beck – Bourque5:00

    xG 0.24–0.21 (53%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm10:15

    xG 0.38–0.15 (71%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Franson – Jones12:29

    xG 0.48–0.38 (56%)attempts 19–14goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Josi17:21

    xG 0.47–0.87 (35%)attempts 13–28goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestMoss – McGinn – Arcobello10:15

    xG 0.25–0.10 (72%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Doan – Erat – Chipchura9:14

    xG 0.63–0.48 (57%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

  3. Crombeen – Vitale – Cunningham4:07

    xG 0.12–0.03 (81%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Gagner – Shinnimin – Rieder9:11

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Dahlbeck13:56

    xG 0.65–0.36 (64%)attempts 17–17goals 0–0

  2. Stone – Ekman-Larsson15:00

    xG 0.51–0.58 (47%)attempts 15–18goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Moore2:20

    xG 0.00–0.09 (2%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.3 xGNSH 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARINSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #575 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

ARI winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).