Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 16, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Washington Capitals 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
WSH11111515071438
BUF2150817030333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:02BUFTyler EnnisPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Brian Gionta · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:23WSHCurtis GlencrossPPAssists: Joel Ward, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.41 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:08BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Tim Schaller · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:09WSHMike GreenAssists: Marcus Johansson, Brooks Laich · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:55WSHEvgeny KuznetsovPPAssists: Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:50BUFJohan LarssonAssists: Chad Ruhwedel, Matt Moulson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  2. 2. WSH Evgeny Kuznetsov scored
  3. 3. BUF Matt Moulson stopped
  4. 4. WSH Nicklas Backstrom stopped
  5. 5. BUF Phil Varone stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:28BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 3:28WSHAlex Ovechkin: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 3:28WSHAlex Ovechkin: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 7:36BUFJerry D'Amigo: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 1:50WSHEric Fehr: Holding2 min
  6. P3 4:10BUFNikita Zadorov: Delaying game2 min · PPG
  7. P3 9:49WSHTroy Brouwer: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHBUF
38Shots on goal33
2.8Expected goals2.9
78Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
24Hits23
9Blocked shots26
2Giveaways4
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestLaich – Conner – Johansson4:11

    xG 0.18–0.03 (86%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Johansson8:50

    xG 0.28–0.19 (59%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Laich – Conner – Wilson4:21

    xG 0.12–0.16 (42%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Glencross – Brouwer – Kuznetsov13:07

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Schmidt12:06

    xG 0.52–0.21 (71%)attempts 16–7goals 0–1

  2. Gleason – Green9:21

    xG 0.26–0.26 (50%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  3. Green – Schmidt2:31

    xG 0.04–0.07 (35%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Ennis – Larsson13:36

    xG 0.90–0.23 (79%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Varone14:02

    xG 0.36–0.39 (48%)attempts 8–22goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Dalpe – D'Amigo3:01

    xG 0.14–0.27 (35%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Hodgson – Deslauriers – Schaller10:30

    xG 0.08–0.26 (22%)attempts 4–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRuhwedel – Zadorov11:45

    xG 0.51–0.22 (70%)attempts 12–11goals 2–0

  2. Benoit – Strachan17:11

    xG 0.63–0.41 (61%)attempts 15–20goals 0–1

  3. Weber – Ristolainen19:38

    xG 0.46–0.64 (42%)attempts 10–29goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.9 xGWSH 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #180 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).