Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 19, 2015·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

San Jose Sharks 4, Toronto Maple Leafs 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

TOR winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS121310011442
TOR0811406128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:02SJSTomas HertlAssists: Chris Tierney, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Snap, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:06SJSLogan CouturePPGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:54TORJake GardinerAssists: Leo Komarov, Brandon Kozun · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:19SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Snap, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:54SJSTommy WingelsAssists: Matt Nieto, Logan Couture · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:15TORTyler Bozak: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 4:39SJSLogan Couture: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 7:34TORBrandon Kozun: Holding2 min
  4. P1 13:16TORSam Carrick: Boarding2 min
  5. P2 0:55TORTrevor Smith: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:48SJSTomas Hertl: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P3 3:10TORRichard Panik: Charging2 min
  8. P3 19:23SJSBrenden Dillon: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 19:23TORJames van Riemsdyk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Thornton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSTOR
42Shots on goal28
4.0Expected goals1.4
79Shot attempts48
36Faceoffs won38
5Power plays2
6Penalty minutes12
22Hits46
12Blocked shots15
4Giveaways9
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Wingels – Nieto10:00

    xG 0.60–0.06 (91%)attempts 15–3goals 1–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Karlsson9:30

    xG 0.68–0.29 (70%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  3. Smith – Tarasov – Goodrow6:30

    xG 0.26–0.14 (65%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Marleau – Hertl – Tierney11:56

    xG 0.32–0.20 (62%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – Mueller16:24

    xG 0.87–0.20 (81%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  2. Vlasic – Braun14:24

    xG 0.65–0.24 (73%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Irwin13:49

    xG 0.47–0.27 (63%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKomarov – Panik – Kozun6:49

    xG 0.26–0.12 (67%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Lupul – Komarov – Kozun2:47

    xG 0.04–0.04 (45%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Lupul – Booth – Smith7:14

    xG 0.08–0.13 (37%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Lindstrom – Sill – Carrick7:25

    xG 0.06–0.26 (20%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Brewer – MacWilliam3:11

    xG 0.06–0.06 (48%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Brewer – Rielly10:38

    xG 0.25–0.30 (46%)attempts 5–17goals 0–1

  3. MacWilliam – Erixon11:20

    xG 0.13–0.27 (33%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 1.4 xGSJS 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #800 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

TOR winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).