Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 28, 2015·Pepsi Center, Denver

Buffalo Sabres 3, Colorado Avalanche 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF01208318338
COL2122317522

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:47COLMarc-Andre ClicheAssists: Cody McLeod, Dennis Everberg · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:19COLJohn MitchellAssists: Matt Duchene, Jarome Iginla · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:29COLTyson BarrieAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 6:56COLMatt DucheneGWGAssists: Jarome Iginla, Zach Redmond · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P3 3:09BUFAndrej MeszarosAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Johan Larsson · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:48COLBrad StuartAssists: Jarome Iginla, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–5
  7. P3 5:29BUFAndrej MeszarosUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:43BUFRasmus RistolainenAssists: Marcus Foligno, Zac Dalpe · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:52COLZach Redmond: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:44COLNick Holden: Interference2 min
  3. P1 0:00COLCody McLeod: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 0:00BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 13:36COLGabriel Landeskog: Charging2 min
  6. P3 14:05BUFZach Bogosian: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCOL
38Shots on goal22
3.5Expected goals3.4
65Shot attempts45
33Faceoffs won25
3Power plays1
4Penalty minutes8
26Hits26
8Blocked shots17
0Giveaways5
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestEllis – Hodgson – Schaller8:57

    xG 0.51–0.05 (92%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Dalpe – Foligno – Grigorenko9:20

    xG 0.77–0.46 (63%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  3. Gionta – Moulson – Larsson12:08

    xG 0.57–0.53 (51%)attempts 14–9goals 1–3

  4. Kaleta – Deslauriers – Varone10:33

    xG 0.04–0.35 (11%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMeszaros – Ristolainen8:51

    xG 0.52–0.07 (88%)attempts 10–4goals 3–0

  2. Benoit – Bogosian14:52

    xG 0.97–0.68 (59%)attempts 22–14goals 0–3

  3. Strachan – Weber8:55

    xG 0.17–0.09 (65%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCaron – Hishon – Hamilton5:35

    xG 0.20–0.05 (80%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. McLeod – Cliche – Everberg4:41

    xG 0.27–0.15 (64%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  3. McLeod – Cliche – Hishon2:08

    xG 0.05–0.14 (25%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Iginla – Mitchell – Duchene13:11

    xG 0.47–0.67 (41%)attempts 11–17goals 3–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Barrie2:10

    xG 0.22–0.15 (59%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  2. Stuart – Holden13:53

    xG 0.59–0.55 (52%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  3. Hejda – Holden2:02

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.4 xGBUF 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #416 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).