Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 12, 2015·TD Garden, Boston

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Boston Bruins 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 56% of the time.

BOS winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL292826623
BOS21311007330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:59BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Torey Krug, Patrice Bergeron · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:02BOSLoui ErikssonPPAssists: Torey Krug, David Krejci · Snap, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:42TBLBrian BoyleAssists: Victor Hedman, Vladislav Namestnikov · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:51TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Anton Stralman · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:48TBLBrian BoyleUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P2 12:20BOSLoui ErikssonPPAssists: David Krejci, Torey Krug · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P2 15:17TBLSteven StamkosPPGWGAssists: Anton Stralman, Tyler Johnson · Snap, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 5:38TBLJonathan DrouinAssists: Erik Condra, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–3
  9. P3 15:58TBLValtteri FilppulaAssists: Alex Killorn, JT Brown · Wrist, 0.18 xG6–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:41TBLMatt Carle: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:39TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:58BOSPatrice Bergeron: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:44TBLAndrej Sustr: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 6:34BOSDavid Krejci: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P2 11:01TBLMatt Carle: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:13BOSPatrice Bergeron: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 12:38BOSDavid Pastrnak: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win54% to win
← TBL attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Krejci
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLBOS
23Shots on goal30
2.0Expected goals1.8
48Shot attempts49
29Faceoffs won30
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
9Hits34
10Blocked shots9
7Giveaways5
8Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Namestnikov – Brown11:00

    xG 0.22–0.15 (59%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov9:28

    xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Filppula – Condra – Killorn11:46

    xG 0.18–0.24 (43%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  4. Callahan – Stamkos – Drouin10:26

    xG 0.09–0.48 (16%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Hedman8:45

    xG 0.25–0.12 (68%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  2. Hedman – Sustr4:12

    xG 0.15–0.03 (85%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Carle – Sustr8:45

    xG 0.17–0.06 (73%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Bergeron – Connolly10:53

    xG 0.56–0.20 (73%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  2. Talbot – Rinaldo – Kemppainen6:34

    xG 0.12–0.08 (58%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  3. Krejci – Beleskey – Pastrnak13:58

    xG 0.43–0.48 (47%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  4. Kelly – Hayes – Spooner11:06

    xG 0.07–0.30 (20%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Miller11:49

    xG 0.42–0.14 (75%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Chara – Miller3:54

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. McQuaid – Krug12:05

    xG 0.22–0.19 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 1.8 xGTBL 2.0 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #165 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 56% of the time.

BOS winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).