Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 12, 2015·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 3, Nashville Predators 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL21301111325
NSH112010114236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:37COLFrancois BeaucheminPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Matt Duchene · Slap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:38COLNick HoldenAssists: Alex Tanguay, John Mitchell · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:52NSHMiikka SalomakiAssists: Ryan Ellis, Colton Sissons · Deflected, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:58NSHCraig SmithAssists: Ryan Ellis, Mattias Ekholm · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:36COLAndreas MartinsenGWGAssists: Carl Soderberg, Francois Beauchemin · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:45COLCarl Soderberg: Interference2 min
  2. P1 7:22NSHPaul Gaustad: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:33NSHPaul Gaustad: Holding2 min
  4. P2 3:44NSHMike Ribeiro: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 7:52COLTyson Barrie: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 7:52NSHCody Hodgson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 10:46COLMatt Duchene: Boarding2 min
  8. P2 14:21COLJarome Iginla: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 17:08COLCody McLeod: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 5:59NSHAustin Watson: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 12:00COLAndreas Martinsen: Elbowing2 min
  12. P3 16:06NSHMike Ribeiro: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win54% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Jarnkrok
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
25Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals2.6
39Shot attempts68
36Faceoffs won36
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes12
14Hits24
17Blocked shots6
9Giveaways12
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestComeau – Soderberg – Martinsen8:59

    xG 0.83–0.18 (82%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Duchene – Grigorenko – MacKinnon11:27

    xG 0.29–0.22 (56%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Tanguay – Mitchell5:40

    xG 0.09–0.20 (30%)attempts 3–12goals 1–1

  4. McLeod – Skille – Wagner5:35

    xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Johnson12:25

    xG 0.90–0.27 (77%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  2. Guenin – Gormley7:26

    xG 0.09–0.18 (33%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Holden – Barrie11:26

    xG 0.15–0.28 (35%)attempts 6–12goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestHodgson – Watson – Sissons6:12

    xG 0.31–0.06 (85%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Ribeiro – Smith – Arvidsson7:53

    xG 0.28–0.05 (85%)attempts 12–1goals 1–0

  3. Gaustad – Nystrom – Salomaki6:30

    xG 0.15–0.11 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Neal – Jarnkrok – Forsberg11:56

    xG 0.22–0.28 (44%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Jones9:04

    xG 0.44–0.22 (67%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Josi12:22

    xG 0.22–0.42 (35%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Ekholm13:49

    xG 0.43–0.69 (38%)attempts 21–7goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.6 xGCOL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #226 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).