Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 17, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

New York Rangers 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 81% of the time.

MIN winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR051919223
MIN15115315535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:27MINMikko KoivuAssists: Thomas Vanek, Zach Parise · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 17:30MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Mikael Granlund · Deflected, 0.29 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:51NYRDominic MooreAssists: Emerson Etem, Tanner Glass · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:38MINJason PominvillePPGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P3 10:18MINChris PorterAssists: Justin Fontaine, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.02 xG1–4
  6. P3 16:23NYRRyan McDonaghAssists: J.T. Miller, Jesper Fast · Snap, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:43MINMikko KoivuAssists: Ryan Carter, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.38 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:52NYRDylan McIlrath: Interference2 min
  2. P2 10:34MINJarret Stoll: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 15:40NYRDan Boyle: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 9:20NYRBrady Skjei: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 11:05MINNino Niederreiter: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P3 18:10NYRDylan McIlrath: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 18:10MINCharlie Coyle: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win54% to win
← NYR attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Brassard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRMIN
23Shots on goal35
1.9Expected goals3.8
41Shot attempts56
25Faceoffs won28
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
22Hits15
10Blocked shots11
10Giveaways6
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. Moore – Glass – Etem9:27

    xG 0.39–0.66 (37%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Kreider – Fast – Miller11:40

    xG 0.26–0.59 (31%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  3. Stalberg – Lindberg – Hayes8:10

    xG 0.14–0.73 (16%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Nash – Brassard – Zuccarello13:13

    xG 0.11–0.85 (11%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – McIlrath7:43

    xG 0.21–0.07 (75%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – Skjei3:40

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

  3. Staal – McIlrath3:21

    xG 0.04–0.03 (54%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Niederreiter – Fontaine10:58

    xG 0.81–0.29 (74%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Vanek – Zucker12:31

    xG 0.67–0.23 (75%)attempts 9–9goals 1–1

  3. Pominville – Parise – Granlund12:29

    xG 0.70–0.32 (69%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Porter – Carter7:22

    xG 0.04–0.03 (53%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Brodin6:35

    xG 0.67–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–2goals 2–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon19:27

    xG 0.70–0.21 (77%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Prosser6:35

    xG 0.49–0.26 (65%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.8 xGNYR 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #573 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 81% of the time.

MIN winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).