Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 2, 2016·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Ottawa Senators 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT2521117523
PIT316216112644

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:01PITMatt CullenAssists: Carl Hagelin, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:54PITKris LetangAssists: Sidney Crosby, Chris Kunitz · Backhand, 0.20 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:50OTTMark StoneAssists: Zack Smith, Jean-Gabriel Pageau · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:17PITChris KunitzUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P1 19:29OTTChris WidemanAssists: Mark Stone · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P2 3:01OTTJean-Gabriel PageauAssists: Erik Karlsson, Patrick Wiercioch · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P2 3:25OTTCody CeciAssists: Zack Smith, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.31 xG4–3
  8. P2 6:10PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Kris Letang, Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. P2 16:45PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–5
  10. P3 6:40PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Chris Kunitz, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–6
  11. P3 15:50OTTDave DziurzynskiAssists: Cody Ceci, Curtis Lazar · Snap, 0.03 xG5–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 2:27OTTJared Cowen: Holding2 min
  2. P2 2:27PITTom Kuhnhackl: Embellishment2 min
  3. P2 5:27OTTDave Dziurzynski: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:26OTTMark Borowiecki: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 19:08PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min
  6. P3 6:47OTTChris Neil: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:12OTTMark Borowiecki: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 16:41OTTMika Zibanejad: High sticking double minor4 min
  9. P3 18:29PITChris Kunitz: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win54% to win
← OTT attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pageau won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPIT
23Shots on goal44
2.1Expected goals4.1
39Shot attempts69
43Faceoffs won31
1Power plays5
14Penalty minutes6
31Hits16
11Blocked shots11
3Giveaways5
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Smith – Stone – Pageau11:32

    xG 0.22–0.34 (39%)attempts 9–7goals 2–1

  2. Ryan – Hoffman – Zibanejad10:24

    xG 0.66–0.96 (41%)attempts 8–16goals 0–2

  3. Neil – McCormick – Prince5:19

    xG 0.14–0.43 (24%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Chiasson – Dziurzynski – Lazar7:31

    xG 0.10–0.46 (18%)attempts 3–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Cowen – Wideman7:48

    xG 0.26–0.22 (54%)attempts 4–7goals 1–1

  2. Karlsson – Borowiecki12:43

    xG 0.75–0.72 (51%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1

  3. Karlsson – Wiercioch4:09

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist12:29

    xG 1.20–0.01 (99%)attempts 20–2goals 3–0

  2. Cullen – Porter – Wilson5:56

    xG 0.54–0.11 (83%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Rust – Kuhnhackl4:40

    xG 0.19–0.02 (89%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Fehr – Rust – Kuhnhackl7:14

    xG 0.15–0.15 (50%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDaley – Dumoulin14:35

    xG 1.10–0.11 (91%)attempts 16–4goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Maatta15:56

    xG 1.14–0.15 (88%)attempts 22–6goals 3–1

  3. Lovejoy – Pouliot11:42

    xG 0.62–0.27 (70%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.1 xGOTT 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #42 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).