Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 3, 2016·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Calgary Flames 3, Buffalo Sabres 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 86% of the time.

BUF winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY0421619329
BUF08314313635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:18CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Lance Bouma · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:27BUFRasmus RistolainenAssists: Brian Gionta, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:57BUFMarcus FolignoSHAssists: Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:12CGYDougie HamiltonPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:14BUFNicolas DeslauriersAssists: Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:56CGYSean MonahanAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Dougie Hamilton · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 9:31BUFJohan LarssonGWGAssists: Brian Gionta, Marcus Foligno · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:46BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:29BUFEvander KaneENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.69 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:46CGYMikael Backlund: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:01CGYJosh Jooris: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 13:36CGYGarnet Hathaway: Interference2 min
  4. P1 16:40BUFJake McCabe: Holding2 min
  5. P1 18:32BUFMark Pysyk: Interference2 min
  6. P1 0:00CGYDougie Hamilton: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 5:32CGYJakub Nakladal: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 14:44BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P3 4:35CGYJoe Colborne: Interference2 min
  10. P3 10:28CGYGarnet Hathaway: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 10:58CGYMark Giordano: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win54% to win
← CGY attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYBUF
29Shots on goal35
1.8Expected goals4.0
54Shot attempts57
31Faceoffs won29
3Power plays8
16Penalty minutes6
23Hits13
11Blocked shots16
6Giveaways7
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Bouma – Hathaway5:13

    xG 0.35–0.06 (85%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  2. Stajan – Bollig – Jooris5:07

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Frolik – Gaudreau – Bennett7:58

    xG 0.37–0.27 (58%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  4. Frolik – Ferland – Bennett2:47

    xG 0.06–0.01 (82%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Hamilton4:13

    xG 0.58–0.13 (82%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Engelland – Hamilton5:35

    xG 0.28–0.18 (61%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  3. Jokipakka – Hamilton3:24

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Reinhart – Eichel10:28

    xG 0.55–0.19 (74%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson9:10

    xG 0.54–0.34 (62%)attempts 9–7goals 2–1

  3. Legwand – Moulson – Catenacci4:12

    xG 0.11–0.10 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. O'Reilly – Deslauriers – Girgensons6:50

    xG 0.09–0.12 (42%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – McCabe14:19

    xG 0.53–0.39 (58%)attempts 11–18goals 1–1

  2. Gorges – McCabe2:21

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Gorges – Ristolainen12:04

    xG 0.54–0.56 (49%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.0 xGCGY 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #44 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.59 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 86% of the time.

BUF winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).