Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 5, 2016·Pepsi Center, Denver

Nashville Predators 5, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH01519416540
COL19113014236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:27COLBlake ComeauAssists: Carl Soderberg, Shawn Matthias · Backhand, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 15:30NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Craig Smith, Mike Ribeiro · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:14COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Francois Beauchemin · Slap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:02NSHJames NealAssists: Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:16NSHMike FisherGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:22NSHShea WeberENAssists: Filip Forsberg, Austin Watson · Slap, 0.67 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:05NSHMiikka SalomakiENAssists: Calle Jarnkrok, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.74 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:42COLFrancois Beauchemin: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:55COLGabriel Landeskog: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 18:39NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 18:39COLJarome Iginla: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 18:39NSHRyan Johansen: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 1:57COLCarl Soderberg: Interference2 min
  7. P2 10:13NSHPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 10:13COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:20NSHCraig Smith: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 3:28NSHMike Fisher: Holding2 min
  11. P3 19:47COLCody McLeod: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Duchene won the faceoff against Ribeiro
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
40Shots on goal36
4.7Expected goals3.1
69Shot attempts67
20Faceoffs won42
4Power plays3
16Penalty minutes18
28Hits27
22Blocked shots22
2Giveaways6
12Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestFisher – Salomaki – Arvidsson3:42

    xG 0.45–0.24 (65%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Fisher – Wilson – Arvidsson4:09

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  3. Gaustad – Watson – Salomaki5:28

    xG 0.06–0.06 (51%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Neal – Jarnkrok – Johansen10:27

    xG 0.38–0.39 (49%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm17:10

    xG 0.95–0.84 (53%)attempts 19–21goals 2–1

  2. Granberg – Bitetto9:20

    xG 0.26–0.45 (37%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  3. Weber – Josi17:12

    xG 0.41–0.90 (31%)attempts 16–19goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Duchene – Grigorenko12:01

    xG 0.82–0.05 (94%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Matthias7:52

    xG 0.44–0.24 (64%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  3. Boedker – Landeskog – MacKinnon12:39

    xG 0.71–0.85 (45%)attempts 15–19goals 1–1

  4. Mitchell – McLeod – Skille5:07

    xG 0.20–0.38 (35%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Barrie15:23

    xG 0.91–0.37 (71%)attempts 19–15goals 0–1

  2. Beauchemin – Johnson14:07

    xG 0.73–0.64 (53%)attempts 17–18goals 1–1

  3. Bodnarchuk – Bigras8:48

    xG 0.15–0.43 (26%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.1 xGNSH 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #298 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.95 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).