Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 23, 2016·Madison Square Garden, New York

Boston Bruins 2, New York Rangers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 60% of the time.

NYR winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS09114118241
NYR281927524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:37NYRMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:39NYRDerek StepanPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Henrik Lundqvist · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:26NYRDerick BrassardGWGAssists: Kevin Klein, Jesper Fast · Slap, 0.03 xG0–3
  4. P2 9:34BOSLee StempniakAssists: Brad Marchand, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:32NYRJ.T. MillerAssists: Derek Stepan, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:06BOSFrank VatranoAssists: Loui Eriksson, Zdeno Chara · Snap, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:07NYRRick NashENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.73 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:53BOSPatrice Bergeron: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 6:35NYRTanner Glass: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:35BOSMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P1 7:00BOSJimmy Hayes: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 11:23BOSDavid Krejci: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 2:03BOSJimmy Hayes: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 10:01BOSZdeno Chara: High sticking double minor4 min
  8. P2 12:55NYRMats Zuccarello: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 15:47NYRDan Boyle: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
47% to win54% to win
← BOS attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Stepan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSNYR
41Shots on goal24
2.8Expected goals3.4
75Shot attempts46
42Faceoffs won25
2Power plays6
17Penalty minutes9
30Hits27
9Blocked shots18
11Giveaways13
7Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Stempniak – Marchand11:47

    xG 0.89–0.28 (76%)attempts 17–4goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Krejci – Pastrnak7:42

    xG 0.27–0.11 (70%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson – Krejci – Vatrano2:12

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Ferraro – Acciari4:02

    xG 0.13–0.07 (66%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Miller13:19

    xG 0.76–0.11 (87%)attempts 19–4goals 1–0

  2. Seidenberg – Krug2:05

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. McQuaid – Krug10:16

    xG 0.34–0.31 (52%)attempts 13–5goals 0–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. Nash – Brassard – Fast8:22

    xG 0.06–0.09 (38%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Moore – Glass – Stalberg8:43

    xG 0.13–0.25 (34%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Kreider – Hayes10:10

    xG 0.26–0.40 (40%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

  4. Stepan – Zuccarello – Miller9:10

    xG 0.47–0.84 (36%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Boyle – Staal15:32

    xG 0.43–0.43 (50%)attempts 9–24goals 0–0

  2. Klein – McDonagh13:09

    xG 0.50–0.97 (34%)attempts 8–21goals 2–1

  3. Yandle – Girardi14:35

    xG 0.04–0.60 (7%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.4 xGBOS 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #576 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 60% of the time.

NYR winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).