Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 13, 2016·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Montréal Canadiens 4, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL181729424
BUF06015110131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:43MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:21MTLTorrey MitchellGWGAssists: Paul Byron, Phillip Danault · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–0
  3. P3 0:35BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:43MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Shea Weber, Alex Galchenyuk · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:36MTLAndrew ShawAssists: Daniel Carr, David Desharnais · Backhand, 0.07 xG4–1
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:24BUFJosh Gorges: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:12BUFMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 9:26MTLDaniel Carr: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 14:51MTLNathan Beaulieu: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 0:23MTLShea Weber: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:18MTLAlexander Radulov: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 8:18MTLAlexander Radulov: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 8:18BUFJosh Gorges: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 18:28MTLAlex Galchenyuk: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 0:00MTLAndrew Shaw: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← MTL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kane won the faceoff against Galchenyuk
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLBUF
24Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals2.2
44Shot attempts53
25Faceoffs won40
2Power plays5
22Penalty minutes6
14Hits28
12Blocked shots8
8Giveaways8
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestMitchell – Byron – Danault7:37

    xG 0.62–0.21 (74%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  2. Plekanec – Radulov – Lehkonen10:19

    xG 0.37–0.11 (76%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Shaw – Carr8:42

    xG 0.33–0.15 (68%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  4. Pacioretty – Gallagher – Galchenyuk11:37

    xG 0.43–0.40 (52%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarkov – Pateryn14:56

    xG 1.10–0.28 (79%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

  2. Weber – Emelin2:10

    xG 0.03–0.02 (63%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Beaulieu15:27

    xG 0.50–0.50 (50%)attempts 10–10goals 3–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Girgensons – Reinhart2:47

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. O'Reilly – Kane – Reinhart7:23

    xG 0.14–0.10 (58%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Ennis – Foligno – Larsson8:38

    xG 0.15–0.34 (31%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

  4. Gionta – Grant – Deslauriers6:31

    xG 0.12–0.35 (25%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Franson – Bogosian2:06

    xG 0.01–0.03 (31%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Bogosian – McCabe14:12

    xG 0.30–0.34 (47%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. Gorges – Ristolainen14:07

    xG 0.48–0.60 (44%)attempts 10–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGMTL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 31/100 · #809 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.05 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).