Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 17, 2016·Madison Square Garden, New York

San Jose Sharks 4, New York Rangers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 75% of the time.

NYR winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11008313431
NYR1821249729

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:06NYRMarc StaalAssists: Derek Stepan, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:02SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Joe Thornton · Snap, 0.37 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:15NYRRick NashAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Chris Kreider · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:21NYRChris KreiderPPAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Antti Raanta · Snap, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:13SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Joe Pavelski, Paul Martin · Snap, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:16NYRKevin HayesAssists: Jesper Fast, J.T. Miller · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 12:37NYRJimmy VeseyGWGAssists: Derek Stepan, Mats Zuccarello · Snap, 0.24 xG2–5
  8. P3 13:57SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Joe Pavelski, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–5
  9. P3 15:31SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Brent Burns, Tomas Hertl · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–5
  10. P3 18:24NYRMats ZuccarelloENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.58 xG4–6
  11. P3 19:53NYRMichael GrabnerENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.71 xG4–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 17:16NYRMika Zibanejad: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:29NYRJesper Fast: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 5:16SJSTomas Hertl: Interference2 min
  4. P2 8:30SJSBrenden Dillon: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:53NYRJ.T. Miller: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 17:25NYRDylan McIlrath: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 17:25NYRDylan McIlrath: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 17:25SJSTomas Hertl: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 4:37SJSJoe Thornton: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
44% to win56% to win
← SJS attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Thornton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSNYR
31Shots on goal29
2.7Expected goals4.3
61Shot attempts44
29Faceoffs won39
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
17Hits25
7Blocked shots18
13Giveaways6
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Donskoi – Hertl4:14

    xG 0.08–0.01 (87%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Couture3:56

    xG 0.05–0.03 (64%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  3. Couture – Boedker – Donskoi5:23

    xG 0.27–0.27 (50%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Wingels – Nieto – Karlsson5:00

    xG 0.11–0.10 (50%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Vlasic2:31

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  2. Martin – Burns11:51

    xG 0.44–0.31 (58%)attempts 13–6goals 2–2

  3. Vlasic – Braun13:53

    xG 0.39–0.50 (43%)attempts 15–8goals 0–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Kreider – Zibanejad10:14

    xG 0.93–0.40 (70%)attempts 13–10goals 1–3

  2. Grabner – Pirri – Jooris5:52

    xG 0.08–0.05 (64%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Fast – Miller8:52

    xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

  4. Stepan – Zuccarello – Vesey6:49

    xG 0.39–0.51 (44%)attempts 4–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Holden14:16

    xG 0.85–0.35 (71%)attempts 10–15goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Clendening9:32

    xG 0.55–0.13 (81%)attempts 8–7goals 2–0

  3. Staal – McDonagh2:32

    xG 0.09–0.03 (75%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 4.3 xGSJS 2.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #137 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 75% of the time.

NYR winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).