Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 25, 2016·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 77% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF0831105010325
PHI01108319032441

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:06BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Cody Franson · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:56BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Backhand, 0.28 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:43BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P3 4:30PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Ivan Provorov, Mark Streit · Tip-in, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P3 17:04PHIBrayden SchennPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Mark Streit · Snap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:09PHIMark StreitPPAssists: Brayden Schenn, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Nick Cousins stopped
  2. 2. BUF Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux scored
  4. 4. BUF Kyle Okposo stopped
  5. 5. PHI Jakub Voracek scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:24PHISean Couturier: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 3:50PHIClaude Giroux: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:27BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 14:18PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:40PHITravis Konecny: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 2:55BUFHudson Fasching: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 16:40BUFDmitry Kulikov: Charging2 min · PPG
  8. P3 17:33BUFSam Reinhart: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
44% to win56% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
25Shots on goal41
2.4Expected goals4.2
56Shot attempts79
34Faceoffs won39
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
27Hits20
18Blocked shots14
4Giveaways13
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Moulson – Okposo – O'Reilly12:14

    xG 0.30–0.43 (41%)attempts 14–18goals 0–0

  2. Grant – Deslauriers – Fasching6:53

    xG 0.09–0.30 (23%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  3. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson12:21

    xG 0.13–0.47 (22%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

  4. Ennis – Girgensons – Reinhart9:26

    xG 0.49–0.84 (37%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFranson – McCabe10:49

    xG 0.51–0.38 (57%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  2. Gorges – Ristolainen17:49

    xG 0.29–0.59 (33%)attempts 8–20goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Kulikov17:55

    xG 0.30–1.09 (21%)attempts 13–25goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGordon – VandeVelde – Lyubimov5:03

    xG 0.67–0.06 (92%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Simmonds – Read – Couturier5:29

    xG 0.30–0.05 (85%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Simmonds – Read8:29

    xG 0.42–0.25 (62%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Schenn – Cousins – Bellemare9:54

    xG 0.26–0.11 (70%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStreit – Gudas12:16

    xG 0.98–0.22 (82%)attempts 20–6goals 0–1

  2. MacDonald – Gostisbehere11:49

    xG 0.59–0.35 (63%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Streit – Gostisbehere3:13

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.2 xGBUF 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #79 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.14 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +59 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 77% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).