Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 17, 2016·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Nashville Predators 5, Ottawa Senators 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH21711726540
OTT17014010131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:14NSHColton SissonsAssists: Austin Watson, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.44 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:36OTTDerick BrassardPPAssists: Chris Wideman, Mark Stone · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:34NSHRyan EllisGWGAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Filip Forsberg · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:10NSHPontus AbergAssists: Mike Fisher, Colin Wilson · Snap, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 10:22NSHJames NealAssists: P.K. Subban, Ryan Johansen · Snap, 0.12 xG4–1
  6. P3 14:36NSHMike RibeiroAssists: P.K. Subban, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.06 xG5–1
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 5:42NSHMike Fisher: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:02OTTDion Phaneuf: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 19:02NSHJames Neal: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 2:10OTTMatt Puempel: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 6:37NSHRyan Johansen: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 8:37OTTMark Stone: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 9:22OTTZack Smith: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 9:22NSHRyan Johansen: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 13:16OTTZack Smith: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 13:16NSHRyan Johansen: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 13:16OTTZack Smith: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 13:24NSHFilip Forsberg: Tripping2 min
  13. P2 19:40NSHJames Neal: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 4:07NSHPontus Aberg: Hooking2 min
  15. P3 12:35OTTMark Borowiecki: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
44% to win56% to win
← NSH attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Turris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHOTT
40Shots on goal31
3.2Expected goals2.0
61Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won28
4Power plays6
18Penalty minutes14
17Hits29
18Blocked shots11
9Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJarnkrok – Watson – Sissons6:20

    xG 0.74–0.13 (85%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  2. Neal – Johansen – Arvidsson10:35

    xG 1.19–0.64 (65%)attempts 19–14goals 1–0

  3. Ribeiro – Smith – Forsberg7:24

    xG 0.17–0.05 (76%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

  4. Fisher – Wilson – Aberg7:47

    xG 0.09–0.50 (15%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm14:13

    xG 1.07–0.52 (67%)attempts 19–12goals 1–0

  2. Josi – Ellis12:37

    xG 1.14–0.60 (65%)attempts 17–17goals 3–0

  3. Weber – Irwin11:57

    xG 0.19–0.17 (52%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Kelly – Pyatt – Smith2:52

    xG 0.01–0.04 (17%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Ryan – Turris – Dzingel2:48

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Neil – Kelly – McCormick2:06

    xG 0.03–0.10 (22%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  4. Neil – McCormick – Puempel3:22

    xG 0.21–0.50 (30%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorowiecki – Wideman8:28

    xG 0.31–0.21 (60%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

  2. Methot – Borowiecki2:18

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Borowiecki – Ceci2:36

    xG 0.02–0.03 (40%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.0 xGNSH 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 30/100 · #827 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.01 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).