Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 29, 2016·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Buffalo Sabres 5, Ottawa Senators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 56% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF31414110528
OTT17217111435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:16BUFKyle OkposoPPAssists: Jack Eichel, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:31BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Rasmus Ristolainen · Slap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:47OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Mark Borowiecki, Derick Brassard · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–1
  4. P1 14:18BUFRyan O'ReillyAssists: Josh Gorges, Cody Franson · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 8:20OTTMark StonePPAssists: Kyle Turris, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.44 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:08BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Evander Kane · Deflected, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P2 17:51OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Erik Karlsson, Mark Stone · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:43BUFRyan O'ReillyPPGWGAssists: Sam Reinhart, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.32 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:29OTTMike HoffmanPPAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.05 xG5–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:09OTTDerick Brassard: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:21OTTMark Borowiecki: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:15BUFMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:15OTTMark Borowiecki: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 16:15OTTChris Wideman: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 2:55BUFJosh Gorges: Interference2 min
  7. P2 6:29BUFWilliam Carrier: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:18OTTKyle Turris: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:03BUFJack Eichel: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 16:01OTTErik Karlsson: Interference2 min · PPG
  11. P3 17:14BUFJohan Larsson: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
44% to win56% to win
← BUF attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFOTT
28Shots on goal35
2.6Expected goals2.9
56Shot attempts66
24Faceoffs won36
5Power plays4
13Penalty minutes15
19Hits28
20Blocked shots15
7Giveaways10
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – O'Reilly – Carrier8:49

    xG 0.46–0.30 (61%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Moulson – Grant – Girgensons3:04

    xG 0.11–0.03 (78%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Reinhart – Eichel10:52

    xG 0.38–0.43 (47%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  4. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson8:20

    xG 0.17–0.68 (20%)attempts 3–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Gorges – Ristolainen2:05

    xG 0.08–0.07 (54%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  2. Gorges – Franson10:57

    xG 0.32–0.31 (51%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen13:52

    xG 0.48–0.51 (49%)attempts 18–13goals 0–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestBrassard – Hoffman – Stone11:48

    xG 0.72–0.27 (73%)attempts 13–9goals 2–0

  2. Pyatt – Smith – Pageau7:08

    xG 0.50–0.40 (55%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Turris – Dzingel – Lazar2:27

    xG 0.17–0.12 (58%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Kelly – Pyatt – Smith3:16

    xG 0.05–0.01 (84%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Karlsson5:55

    xG 0.56–0.20 (74%)attempts 10–3goals 1–1

  2. Methot – Ceci2:47

    xG 0.37–0.06 (86%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Borowiecki – Ceci6:42

    xG 0.39–0.13 (75%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.9 xGBUF 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #189 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 56% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).