Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 2, 2017·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Dallas Stars 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL0927110326
TBL1816411625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:27TBLAdam ErneAssists: Yanni Gourde, Andrej Sustr · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:49DALGemel SmithAssists: Esa Lindell, Jason Spezza · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:57DALJason SpezzaAssists: John Klingberg, Esa Lindell · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:42TBLBraydon CoburnAssists: Anton Stralman, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:43TBLBrayden PointAssists: Jake Dotchin, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:27TBLOndrej PalatPPGWGAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:37TBLAdam ErneAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–5
  8. P3 16:40DALBrett RitchieAssists: Esa Lindell, Devin Shore · Backhand, 0.22 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:58TBLAnton StralmanENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.45 xG3–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 4:10DALDan Hamhuis: Holding2 min
  2. P3 11:26DALRadek Faksa: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 11:26TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Embellishment2 min
  4. P3 12:12DALRemi Elie: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 14:40TBLYanni Gourde: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
44% to win56% to win
← DAL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Eakin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALTBL
26Shots on goal25
1.4Expected goals2.5
51Shot attempts55
39Faceoffs won21
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
11Hits17
15Blocked shots18
2Giveaways3
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestCracknell – Dowling – Dickinson11:05

    xG 0.30–0.13 (70%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  2. Benn – Seguin – Shore2:00

    xG 0.01–0.14 (6%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Seguin – Ritchie – Elie8:40

    xG 0.07–0.23 (22%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Benn – Eakin – Shore10:25

    xG 0.06–0.31 (17%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindell – Honka3:54

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  2. Hamhuis – Pateryn12:51

    xG 0.36–0.43 (46%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

  3. Hamhuis – Klingberg3:27

    xG 0.05–0.13 (25%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPalat – Kucherov – Point14:54

    xG 0.67–0.16 (81%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Namestnikov – Gourde – Erne6:01

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Namestnikov – Erne4:11

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Gourde – Drouin3:40

    xG 0.15–0.03 (86%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Dotchin14:03

    xG 0.49–0.16 (75%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Sustr8:10

    xG 0.33–0.12 (73%)attempts 9–3goals 1–1

  3. Stralman – Garrison7:35

    xG 0.18–0.05 (78%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGDAL 1.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #276 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.43 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).