Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 10, 2018·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Arizona Coyotes 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI21618018012443
ARI11011214011327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:53ARIJason DemersAssists: Derek Stepan, Clayton Keller · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:19PHIClaude GirouxPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:41PHIMichael RafflAssists: Scott Laughton, Jordan Weal · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:24ARIAlex GoligoskiAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson, Christian Fischer · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 2:12PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:59ARIZac RinaldoAssists: Max Domi · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ARI Nick Cousins scored
  2. 2. PHI Jordan Weal stopped
  3. 3. ARI Clayton Keller stopped
  4. 4. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  5. 5. ARI Brendan Perlini stopped
  6. 6. PHI Jakub Voracek scored
  7. 7. ARI Derek Stepan stopped
  8. 8. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  9. 9. ARI Tobias Rieder stopped
  10. 10. PHI Sean Couturier stopped
  11. 11. ARI Niklas Hjalmarsson stopped
  12. 12. PHI Michael Raffl stopped
  13. 13. ARI Max Domi stopped
  14. 14. PHI Nolan Patrick scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:05PHIJordan Weal: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 7:21ARIRichard Panik: Holding2 min
  3. P1 10:04ARIChristian Fischer: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:00ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 1:18ARIDerek Stepan: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:36PHIDale Weise: Interference2 min
  7. P3 9:38PHIJakub Voracek: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 9:38ARIJordan Martinook: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Patrick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIARI
43Shots on goal27
3.3Expected goals1.6
68Shot attempts54
32Faceoffs won29
4Power plays2
6Penalty minutes10
18Hits30
17Blocked shots11
6Giveaways10
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Simmonds – Patrick13:28

    xG 1.17–0.41 (74%)attempts 23–13goals 0–1

  2. Weal – Laughton – Raffl9:05

    xG 0.48–0.13 (78%)attempts 10–5goals 1–1

  3. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny12:13

    xG 0.32–0.31 (50%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

  4. Filppula – Lehtera – Weise7:59

    xG 0.16–0.22 (42%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Hagg15:46

    xG 1.03–0.36 (74%)attempts 21–13goals 1–1

  2. Manning – Gudas9:00

    xG 0.66–0.12 (85%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  3. Gostisbehere – Provorov15:57

    xG 0.31–0.26 (55%)attempts 15–18goals 0–1

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Cousins – Martinook10:26

    xG 0.32–0.14 (70%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Stepan – Perlini – Keller12:11

    xG 0.22–0.50 (30%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  3. Rinaldo – Rieder – Domi7:36

    xG 0.15–0.52 (23%)attempts 2–12goals 1–1

  4. Panik – Dvorak – Fischer9:41

    xG 0.32–0.86 (27%)attempts 11–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hjalmarsson – Chychrun14:20

    xG 0.50–0.53 (48%)attempts 17–13goals 0–1

  2. Goligoski – Connauton13:21

    xG 0.32–0.66 (32%)attempts 9–17goals 1–0

  3. Demers – Ekman-Larsson16:23

    xG 0.21–0.91 (19%)attempts 12–19goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 1.6 xGPHI 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #322 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).