Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 10, 2018·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 53% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT011012217240
TOR2729110526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:10TORKasperi KapanenAssists: Tyler Bozak, Josh Leivo · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:13TORNazem KadriAssists: Morgan Rielly, Leo Komarov · Tip-in, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 11:35TORNazem KadriPPGWGAssists: Mitch Marner, Morgan Rielly · Snap, 0.25 xG0–3
  4. P2 18:24TORMitch MarnerPPAssists: Morgan Rielly · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–4
  5. P3 16:24PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Jake Guentzel, Chad Ruhwedel · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:32PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:02TORPatrick MarleauENAssists: Ron Hainsey · Wrist, 0.67 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:59TORLeo Komarov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:07TORConnor Carrick: Holding2 min
  3. P2 2:01TORPatrick Marleau: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 11:26PITJamie Oleksiak: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:20TORRoman Polak: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 16:20PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 17:56PITBrian Dumoulin: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Nylander
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTOR
40Shots on goal26
2.7Expected goals2.7
69Shot attempts43
31Faceoffs won38
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
25Hits19
12Blocked shots17
9Giveaways11
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Hagelin13:02

    xG 0.46–0.16 (74%)attempts 16–3goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – Sheary11:41

    xG 0.62–0.37 (63%)attempts 16–9goals 1–1

  3. Kuhnhackl – Rowney – Jooris8:27

    xG 0.18–0.09 (66%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Kessel – Sheahan9:34

    xG 0.40–0.44 (47%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Ruhwedel13:41

    xG 0.70–0.39 (64%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin14:52

    xG 0.63–0.39 (62%)attempts 18–6goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Oleksiak16:25

    xG 0.45–0.41 (52%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. Plekanec – Leivo – Kapanen5:39

    xG 0.01–0.09 (12%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Nylander – Marner12:58

    xG 0.24–0.40 (38%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Komarov – Kadri11:31

    xG 0.47–0.78 (38%)attempts 8–17goals 1–1

  4. van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Brown9:45

    xG 0.11–0.43 (20%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Rielly11:37

    xG 0.80–0.66 (55%)attempts 12–17goals 2–1

  2. Polak – Rielly2:06

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Carrick – Dermott13:14

    xG 0.17–0.36 (33%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.7 xGPIT 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #499 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.55 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 53% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).