Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 8, 2018·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Arizona Coyotes 4, Philadelphia Flyers 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 73% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI1931501000434
PHI280721412531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:18PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Claude Giroux, Sean Couturier · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:47PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Jori Lehtera · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P1 8:30ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Alex Galchenyuk, Clayton Keller · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:51ARIBrad RichardsonAssists: Michael Grabner, Vinnie Hinostroza · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:14ARIDerek StepanSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P2 6:38ARIMichael GrabnerSHAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Backhand, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 2:21PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Dale Weise, Oskar Lindblom · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 17:47PHIDale WeiseAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.27 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:01PHIShayne GostisbehereGWGAssists: Jakub Voracek, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.08 xG4–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:32ARIRichard Panik: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:38PHIWayne Simmonds: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:42ARIRichard Panik: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 18:27PHIWayne Simmonds: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 5:27ARIVinnie Hinostroza: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 19:37ARIKevin Connauton: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Weal won the faceoff against Stepan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIPHI
34Shots on goal31
2.0Expected goals3.4
49Shot attempts67
20Faceoffs won34
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
25Hits28
20Blocked shots11
11Giveaways15
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestStepan – Cousins – Fischer9:45

    xG 0.78–0.45 (64%)attempts 18–7goals 0–1

  2. Galchenyuk – Crouse – Keller8:42

    xG 0.26–0.43 (38%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Grabner – Hinostroza10:42

    xG 0.14–0.43 (24%)attempts 5–17goals 1–1

  4. Panik – Perlini – Strome9:16

    xG 0.09–0.87 (9%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Connauton2:48

    xG 0.23–0.06 (80%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  2. Demers – Oesterle3:50

    xG 0.08–0.03 (69%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Hjalmarsson – Connauton7:34

    xG 0.32–0.30 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Couturier – Konecny12:12

    xG 0.64–0.18 (78%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Voracek – Lindblom – Patrick11:28

    xG 0.53–0.37 (59%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Lehtera – Laughton – Aube-Kubel2:17

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  4. Simmonds – Weise – Weal12:09

    xG 0.47–0.60 (44%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHagg – Folin2:38

    xG 0.69–0.03 (96%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Hagg – Provorov12:15

    xG 0.65–0.21 (75%)attempts 16–13goals 1–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Provorov3:15

    xG 0.42–0.02 (96%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.4 xGARI 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #56 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.46 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 73% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).