Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 21, 2018·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 77% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI072909225
BUF4120514521

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:38BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jason Pominville · Snap, 0.34 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:20BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Vladimir Sobotka, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P1 8:55BUFEvan RodriguesPPGWGAssists: Sam Reinhart, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.42 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:52BUFJohan LarssonAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:26PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Sean Couturier, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P2 13:51PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Jordan Weal, Travis Sanheim · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:22BUFSam ReinhartENAssists: Jack Eichel · Snap, 0.72 xG2–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:19PHIJordan Weal: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:55BUFJohan Larsson: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 19:55PHIScott Laughton: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 7:31PHISean Couturier: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 3:19BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  6. P3 10:57PHICalvin Pickard: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
25Shots on goal21
1.8Expected goals3.2
44Shot attempts39
28Faceoffs won20
1Power plays3
11Penalty minutes7
21Hits29
10Blocked shots9
6Giveaways11
1Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Simmonds – Weal9:31

    xG 0.44–0.02 (97%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Lehtera – Weise – Laughton3:55

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  3. Voracek – Lindblom – Patrick8:19

    xG 0.06–0.17 (27%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny13:37

    xG 0.40–0.55 (42%)attempts 16–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Provorov2:08

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Sanheim2:53

    xG 0.15–0.03 (82%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Gudas – Sanheim10:15

    xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 4–6goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Skinner – Eichel11:18

    xG 0.56–0.41 (58%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Girgensons – Rodrigues8:33

    xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Sheary – Mittelstadt12:10

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Sobotka – Reinhart – Thompson8:51

    xG 0.20–0.43 (32%)attempts 3–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin15:53

    xG 0.41–0.11 (79%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen16:57

    xG 0.42–0.63 (40%)attempts 5–16goals 1–1

  3. Beaulieu – Nelson10:58

    xG 0.23–0.47 (33%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGPHI 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #473 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 77% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).