Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 24, 2018·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Buffalo Sabres 3, Detroit Red Wings 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF11705110032335
DET013111112011237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:37BUFJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Jack Eichel, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:53DETDylan LarkinAssists: Anthony Mantha, Justin Abdelkader · Snap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P3 7:40BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Zach Bogosian · Slap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 13:52DETAnthony ManthaAssists: Tyler Bertuzzi, Mike Green · Backhand, 0.23 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Frans Nielsen stopped
  2. 2. BUF Jack Eichel stopped
  3. 3. DET Thomas Vanek stopped
  4. 4. BUF Jason Pominville stopped
  5. 5. DET Gustav Nyquist stopped
  6. 6. BUF Casey Mittelstadt stopped
  7. 7. DET Dylan Larkin stopped
  8. 8. BUF Conor Sheary stopped
  9. 9. DET Andreas Athanasiou scored
  10. 10. BUF Tage Thompson scored
  11. 11. DET Justin Abdelkader stopped
  12. 12. BUF Jeff Skinner stopped
  13. 13. DET Michael Rasmussen stopped
  14. 14. BUF Sam Reinhart scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:48DETMichael Rasmussen: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:22BUFJake McCabe: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:17DETTrevor Daley: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:49BUFMarco Scandella: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 5:15BUFSam Reinhart: Interference2 min
  6. P3 6:01DETThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 11:48BUFJake McCabe: Interference2 min
  8. OT 0:55DETDylan Larkin: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larkin won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFDET
35Shots on goal37
3.9Expected goals3.3
65Shot attempts50
27Faceoffs won37
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
12Hits25
7Blocked shots12
9Giveaways18
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Sheary – Mittelstadt11:11

    xG 0.35–0.22 (61%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Elie – Rodrigues7:29

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel12:11

    xG 0.60–0.71 (46%)attempts 17–12goals 0–1

  4. Pominville – Sobotka – Thompson9:28

    xG 0.55–0.71 (44%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin17:19

    xG 0.88–0.67 (57%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Nelson12:10

    xG 0.66–0.45 (59%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen15:58

    xG 0.55–0.93 (37%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestAbdelkader – Mantha – Larkin11:58

    xG 1.04–0.43 (71%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

  2. Vanek – de la Rose – Ehn4:17

    xG 0.19–0.04 (83%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Nielsen – Nyquist – Athanasiou9:29

    xG 0.53–0.55 (49%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Glendening – Bertuzzi – Rasmussen8:19

    xG 0.27–0.35 (44%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Cholowski10:14

    xG 0.78–0.27 (75%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  2. Kronwall – Green3:27

    xG 0.09–0.04 (72%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Jensen – DeKeyser15:20

    xG 0.85–1.06 (45%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.3 xGBUF 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 65/100 · #446 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.87 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).