Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 4, 2018·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Colorado Avalanche 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL018312015345
PIT310011311632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:46PITJake GuentzelAssists: Kris Letang, Brian Dumoulin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:52PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Tanner Pearson, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:27PITDerick BrassardAssists: Olli Maatta, Zachary Aston-Reese · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 8:16COLTyson BarriePPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Gabriel Landeskog · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:32COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Matt Calvert, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:17COLMatt NietoSHAssists: Gabriel Bourque · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:11PITPatric HornqvistPPGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:32PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.03 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:58PITPatric HornqvistUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:47PITDominik Simon: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 6:42PITKris Letang: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 10:59PITSidney Crosby: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 11:44COLMikko Rantanen: Interference2 min
  5. P3 5:47COLPatrik Nemeth: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 14:48PITJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 14:48COLJ.T. Compher: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 17:01COLNathan MacKinnon: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLPIT
45Shots on goal32
4.0Expected goals3.7
78Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won35
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
18Hits33
15Blocked shots16
8Giveaways8
3Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen15:30

    xG 1.08–0.59 (65%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Soderberg – Calvert – Nieto8:28

    xG 0.74–0.45 (62%)attempts 16–5goals 1–1

  3. Wilson – Compher – Jost9:05

    xG 0.91–0.83 (52%)attempts 16–12goals 0–1

  4. Bourque – Kerfoot – Kamenev6:37

    xG 0.10–0.38 (21%)attempts 5–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Nemeth2:05

    xG 0.38–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Cole3:58

    xG 0.57–0.37 (61%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  3. Cole – Barrie10:36

    xG 0.67–0.48 (58%)attempts 17–12goals 0–3

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Pearson10:51

    xG 0.95–0.69 (58%)attempts 13–16goals 3–1

  2. Brassard – Kessel – Aston-Reese10:36

    xG 0.63–0.60 (51%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

  3. Crosby – Guentzel – Simon4:37

    xG 0.35–0.36 (49%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel3:42

    xG 0.16–0.19 (45%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Maatta15:50

    xG 0.59–0.45 (57%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin16:52

    xG 0.95–1.01 (48%)attempts 18–19goals 3–1

  3. Johnson – Letang2:11

    xG 0.06–0.23 (20%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.7 xGCOL 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #123 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.43 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).