Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 22, 2018·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Colorado Avalanche 4, Arizona Coyotes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 75% of the time.

ARI winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11107310428
ARI29212218639

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:58ARIRichard PanikAssists: Derek Stepan, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:13COLAlexander KerfootAssists: Sven Andrighetto, J.T. Compher · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:55ARIDerek StepanAssists: Clayton Keller, Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.00 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:30ARIChristian FischerAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Alex Galchenyuk · Backhand, 0.26 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:28ARIConor GarlandAssists: Mario Kempe, Ilya Lyubushkin · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:22COLGabriel LandeskogPPAssists: J.T. Compher · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:39COLAlexander KerfootAssists: Matt Nieto, Mikko Rantanen · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:51COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Matt Nieto, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. P3 16:21ARIBrad RichardsonGWGAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:48ARIBrad RichardsonENAssists: Nick Cousins, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.75 xG4–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 5:57ARIMario Kempe: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 4:52ARIRichard Panik: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 9:14COLAlexander Kerfoot: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 19:57COLMikko Rantanen: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 4:40ARIDerek Stepan: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:42ARIRichard Panik: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 12:25ARILawson Crouse: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 12:25COLGabriel Landeskog: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richardson won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLARI
28Shots on goal39
2.7Expected goals4.4
56Shot attempts69
34Faceoffs won30
4Power plays2
9Penalty minutes13
28Hits20
19Blocked shots11
8Giveaways5
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – Andrighetto – Compher8:28

    xG 0.63–0.25 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Bourque – Greer – Jost4:59

    xG 0.10–0.17 (37%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  3. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen10:31

    xG 0.02–0.17 (11%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

  4. Soderberg – Calvert – Nieto5:12

    xG 0.37–0.72 (34%)attempts 5–5goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Barrie8:25

    xG 0.43–0.06 (87%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. Nemeth – Lindholm4:50

    xG 0.42–0.10 (81%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  3. Johnson – Cole3:28

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Archibald – Cousins7:29

    xG 0.22–0.00 (99%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Kempe – Crouse – Garland4:58

    xG 0.18–0.05 (77%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Stepan – Panik – Keller7:13

    xG 0.14–0.11 (55%)attempts 10–4goals 2–0

  4. Galchenyuk – Schmaltz – Fischer7:25

    xG 0.83–1.08 (43%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHjalmarsson – Ekman-Larsson12:38

    xG 0.53–0.02 (96%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

  2. Oesterle – Lyubushkin7:04

    xG 0.26–0.22 (54%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  3. Goligoski – Chychrun10:46

    xG 0.09–1.19 (7%)attempts 8–16goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 4.4 xGCOL 2.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARICOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #55 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 75% of the time.

ARI winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).