Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 5, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Minnesota Wild 4, Buffalo Sabres 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN010319113030445
BUF111211112051539

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:31BUFEvan RodriguesPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jack Eichel · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:29MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:32BUFC.J. SmithAssists: Sam Reinhart · Tip-in, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:33BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Jack Eichel, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:43MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Luke Kunin, Ryan Suter · Wrap-around, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:05MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Luke Kunin, Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.28 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:25BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Jake McCabe · Slap, 0.22 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:23MINZach PariseAssists: Charlie Coyle, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.30 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Jack Eichel stopped
  2. 2. MIN Victor Rask stopped
  3. 3. BUF Casey Mittelstadt stopped
  4. 4. MIN Jason Zucker stopped
  5. 5. BUF Sam Reinhart scored
  6. 6. MIN Zach Parise stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 2:56MINMatt Hendricks: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:36BUFSam Reinhart: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 1:23BUFRasmus Dahlin: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:25MINJonas Brodin: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 15:01BUFTage Thompson: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Rask
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBUF
45Shots on goal39
3.6Expected goals2.6
70Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won33
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
14Hits20
9Blocked shots12
11Giveaways17
3Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestParise – Coyle – Kunin10:50

    xG 0.59–0.12 (83%)attempts 10–4goals 2–0

  2. Staal – Zucker – Granlund14:14

    xG 1.00–0.60 (62%)attempts 19–13goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Parise – Coyle2:37

    xG 0.06–0.05 (53%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Rask – Greenway9:32

    xG 0.15–0.22 (40%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Brodin18:01

    xG 0.72–0.56 (56%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon18:47

    xG 0.76–0.79 (49%)attempts 20–17goals 2–0

  3. Bitetto – Hunt8:52

    xG 0.13–0.22 (37%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSheary – Reinhart – Mittelstadt2:56

    xG 0.21–0.02 (93%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Pominville – Skinner – Eichel4:00

    xG 0.07–0.05 (59%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Sheary – Eichel10:22

    xG 0.27–0.30 (47%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Skinner – Mittelstadt7:54

    xG 0.05–0.28 (15%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – McCabe14:42

    xG 0.54–0.41 (57%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Dahlin18:25

    xG 0.38–0.34 (53%)attempts 9–15goals 0–1

  3. Bogosian – Pilut10:48

    xG 0.47–0.85 (35%)attempts 12–17goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.6 xGMIN 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #42 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.79 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).