Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 9, 2019·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11321415432
TBL2191827534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:36PITGarrett WilsonAssists: Teddy Blueger, Matt Cullen · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:02TBLYanni GourdeAssists: Brayden Point, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:59TBLErik CernakAssists: Cedric Paquette, Braydon Coburn · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:42TBLAnthony CirelliSHAssists: Alex Killorn, Ryan McDonagh · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:31PITJared McCannAssists: Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:04PITBryan RustAssists: Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:54TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Ondrej Palat, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 14:03TBLJ.T. MillerGWGAssists: Alex Killorn, Anthony Cirelli · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–5
  9. P3 15:22PITTanner PearsonAssists: Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.11 xG4–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P2 7:19TBLOndrej Palat: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 7:45PITNick Bjugstad: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 11:16PITTeddy Blueger: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 11:16TBLAdam Erne: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 13:14TBLTyler Johnson: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:14PITSidney Crosby: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 17:41PITJack Johnson: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 17:41TBLAlex Killorn: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 14:39PITPatric Hornqvist: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 14:39TBLAdam Erne: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
32Shots on goal34
2.0Expected goals1.8
58Shot attempts60
41Faceoffs won40
1Power plays1
24Penalty minutes24
25Hits22
15Blocked shots14
3Giveaways7
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Wilson – Blueger6:18

    xG 0.36–0.28 (56%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:44

    xG 0.56–0.51 (52%)attempts 14–15goals 0–1

  3. Kessel – Bjugstad – Pearson11:45

    xG 0.22–0.32 (41%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  4. Hornqvist – McCann – Simon10:27

    xG 0.14–0.35 (29%)attempts 8–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Pettersson20:32

    xG 0.86–0.76 (53%)attempts 21–18goals 1–2

  2. Letang – Dumoulin2:13

    xG 0.00–0.05 (3%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Maatta – Riikola17:46

    xG 0.45–0.52 (46%)attempts 13–22goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Miller – Cirelli8:48

    xG 0.66–0.19 (77%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Stamkos – Johnson – Palat4:38

    xG 0.18–0.06 (74%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Gourde – Point9:18

    xG 0.29–0.19 (61%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  4. Paquette – Erne – Joseph7:54

    xG 0.25–0.18 (58%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Cernak16:29

    xG 0.43–0.23 (65%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  2. Coburn – Sergachev16:09

    xG 0.45–0.31 (59%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  3. Hedman – Cernak2:19

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.8 xGPIT 2.0 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #188 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.86 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).