Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 14, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Anaheim Ducks 1, Arizona Coyotes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 66% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA011111015137
ARI292926624

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:25ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonSHAssists: Brad Richardson, Michael Grabner · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:10ARIJason DemersGWGAssists: Christian Dvorak, Clayton Keller · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:58ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Devin Shore, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:15ARIVinnie HinostrozaPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Darcy Kuemper · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:49ARIVinnie HinostrozaPPAssists: Jason Demers, Alex Goligoski · Slap, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 19:10ARIVinnie HinostrozaAssists: Christian Fischer · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:59ARIMario KempeAssists: Christian Fischer · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 9:43ANAHampus Lindholm: Interference2 min
  2. P1 16:05ARIDarcy Kuemper: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 2:34ANAMax Jones: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 8:35ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 12:01ANACarter Rowney: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 15:57ANAAdam Henrique: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 2:12ARIJordan Oesterle: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 5:37ANAKorbinian Holzer: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 15:53ARIAlex Goligoski: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 19:34ANAKorbinian Holzer: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 19:34ARIAlex Galchenyuk: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kempe won the faceoff against Grant
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAARI
37Shots on goal24
3.0Expected goals2.2
69Shot attempts51
24Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
30Hits38
16Blocked shots16
13Giveaways8
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Rowney – Jones9:40

    xG 0.91–0.31 (75%)attempts 15–6goals 0–1

  2. Perry – Henrique – Terry9:24

    xG 0.36–0.07 (83%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Getzlaf – Ritchie – Sprong9:40

    xG 0.38–0.16 (70%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  4. Silfverberg – Rakell – Shore8:40

    xG 0.43–0.36 (54%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Larsson14:25

    xG 1.11–0.24 (82%)attempts 23–6goals 0–0

  2. Holzer – Megna8:17

    xG 0.44–0.33 (57%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Manson – Lindholm14:40

    xG 0.45–0.46 (50%)attempts 14–12goals 0–2

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. Richardson – Grabner – Hinostroza8:40

    xG 0.28–0.26 (52%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  2. Kempe – Galchenyuk – Fischer5:43

    xG 0.06–0.12 (34%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Panik – Dvorak – Keller8:21

    xG 0.04–0.41 (8%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  4. Archibald – Cousins – Crouse8:29

    xG 0.18–0.79 (18%)attempts 3–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Goligoski – Demers11:41

    xG 0.53–0.70 (43%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

  2. Oesterle – Lyubushkin14:03

    xG 0.43–0.70 (38%)attempts 9–19goals 1–0

  3. Hjalmarsson – Ekman-Larsson9:58

    xG 0.00–0.45 (0%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.2 xGANA 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #916 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 66% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).