Sat, Oct 5, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale
Boston Bruins 1, Arizona Coyotes 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 16 | 09 | 011 | 126 |
| ARI | 010 | 011 | 014 | 035 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 18:41BOSBrad MarchandGWGAssists: Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
Penalties (7)
- P1 13:01BOSCharlie McAvoy: Interference2 min
- P2 11:05BOSConnor Clifton: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:05ARILawson Crouse: Roughing2 min
- P2 17:59ARIChristian Fischer: High sticking2 min
- P2 18:07BOSDavid Pastrnak: Interference2 min
- P3 0:48BOSKarson Kuhlman: Interference2 min
- P3 3:24ARIJordan Oesterle: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Richardson won the faceoff against Bergeron
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- Krejci – DeBrusk – Kuhlman9:48
xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0
- Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak9:49
xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0
- Wagner – Kuraly – Lindholm8:15
xG 0.21–0.47 (31%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0
- Coyle – Ritchie – Heinen8:31
xG 0.00–0.59 (0%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Grzelcyk – Clifton11:02
xG 0.40–0.39 (51%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0
- Chara – McAvoy13:26
xG 0.61–0.61 (50%)attempts 14–19goals 0–0
- Krug – Carlo12:09
xG 0.38–0.38 (50%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestKessel – Stepan – Keller12:33
xG 1.05–0.18 (85%)attempts 19–7goals 0–0
- Dvorak – Fischer – Crouse7:40
xG 0.35–0.13 (73%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
- Soderberg – Schmaltz – Garland5:55
xG 0.22–0.07 (76%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1
- Richardson – Grabner – Hinostroza8:27
xG 0.20–0.26 (44%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGoligoski – Hjalmarsson12:47
xG 0.43–0.18 (70%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0
- Oesterle – Chychrun13:44
xG 0.69–0.45 (60%)attempts 15–17goals 0–0
- Demers – Ekman-Larsson15:40
xG 0.57–0.65 (47%)attempts 17–14goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ARI − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).