Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 19, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Ottawa Senators 2, Arizona Coyotes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT05010221236
ARI2817212527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:09ARIKyle CapobiancoAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:32ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonAssists: Clayton Keller, Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:40ARIConor GarlandGWGAssists: Brad Richardson, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–3
  4. P3 1:18ARICarl SoderbergPPAssists: Conor Garland, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–4
  5. P3 2:58OTTVladislav NamestnikovSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:08OTTChris TierneyPPAssists: Thomas Chabot, Craig Anderson · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:05ARILawson CrouseENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.63 xG2–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 4:49OTTJordan Szwarz: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:30OTTColin White: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 13:46OTTAnthony Duclair: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 15:20ARIPhil Kessel: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P2 19:35OTTConnor Brown: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P3 3:33ARIIlya Lyubushkin: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
45% to win55% to win
← OTT attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00White won the faceoff against Soderberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTARI
36Shots on goal27
2.2Expected goals4.6
65Shot attempts71
32Faceoffs won34
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
28Hits17
23Blocked shots12
6Giveaways10
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Ryan – Pageau – Duclair2:32

    xG 0.03–0.03 (51%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Pageau – Brown – Tkachuk7:45

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Namestnikov – Duclair – White6:00

    xG 0.31–0.35 (47%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Ryan – Ennis – Tierney6:22

    xG 0.20–0.25 (44%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Borowiecki – DeMelo10:10

    xG 0.54–0.53 (50%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

  2. DeMelo – Chabot3:21

    xG 0.08–0.18 (32%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

  3. Hainsey – Brannstrom10:34

    xG 0.16–0.53 (23%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Stepan – Keller9:14

    xG 1.04–0.30 (78%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

  2. Schmaltz – Dvorak – Garland9:06

    xG 0.46–0.12 (80%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Grabner – Hinostroza9:55

    xG 0.40–0.36 (53%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  4. Soderberg – Fischer – Crouse7:26

    xG 0.11–0.21 (35%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCapobianco – Lyubushkin13:36

    xG 0.79–0.29 (73%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  2. Demers – Ekman-Larsson13:54

    xG 0.84–0.46 (65%)attempts 14–16goals 1–0

  3. Goligoski – Chychrun13:46

    xG 0.23–0.32 (42%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 4.6 xGOTT 2.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #416 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).