Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 23, 2019·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Anaheim Ducks 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 53% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA113115010238
TBL1835214627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:08TBLBrayden PointAssists: Jan Rutta, Cory Conacher · Wrist, 0.37 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:00ANADerek GrantSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:28TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:57ANARickard RakellAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:39TBLBrayden PointPPGWGAssists: Victor Hedman, Andrei Vasilevskiy · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:25TBLPatrick MaroonAssists: Cedric Paquette, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:20TBLAnthony CirelliPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:27TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Yanni Gourde · Backhand, 0.26 xG2–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 1:42TBLCory Conacher: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:12ANAErik Gudbranson: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:54TBLJan Rutta: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:22ANAHampus Lindholm: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 4:14TBLPatrick Maroon: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 5:38ANATroy Terry: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 15:29TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 15:29TBLAnthony Cirelli: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 15:29ANANick Ritchie: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 15:29ANANick Ritchie: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 15:29ANANick Ritchie: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 15:29ANAKorbinian Holzer: Cross checking2 min
  13. P3 0:00ANADerek Grant: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 0:00TBLPatrick Maroon: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATBL
38Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals3.2
64Shot attempts50
28Faceoffs won35
3Power plays4
24Penalty minutes12
15Hits20
14Blocked shots14
2Giveaways7
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Silfverberg – Jones10:34

    xG 0.35–0.10 (78%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Ritchie – Kase – Steel11:13

    xG 0.31–0.20 (60%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Grant – Shore – Rowney5:30

    xG 0.26–0.17 (60%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Rakell – Terry11:14

    xG 0.36–0.88 (29%)attempts 10–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Lindholm13:14

    xG 0.53–0.36 (59%)attempts 17–8goals 0–1

  2. Fowler – Larsson14:45

    xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  3. Holzer – Guhle12:45

    xG 0.33–0.85 (28%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnson – Conacher – Point3:01

    xG 0.40–0.05 (88%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Maroon – Gourde – Paquette9:33

    xG 0.59–0.26 (69%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

  3. Killorn – Joseph – Cirelli10:10

    xG 0.41–0.46 (47%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Conacher – Palat2:25

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSergachev – Rutta5:31

    xG 0.62–0.30 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 2–0

  2. Coburn – Sergachev6:33

    xG 0.38–0.19 (67%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Shattenkirk – McDonagh2:18

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.2 xGANA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #515 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 53% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).