Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 27, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Anaheim Ducks 3, Arizona Coyotes 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA11111419001334
ARI2801216022428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:02ARIChristian DvorakAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Clayton Keller · Slap, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:22ANABrendan GuhleSHAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:22ARIChristian DvorakAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Jason Demers · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:42ANASam SteelAssists: Nick Ritchie, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:00ANATroy TerryAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:38ARIAlex GoligoskiSHAssists: Christian Fischer · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Troy Terry stopped
  2. 2. ARI Nick Schmaltz stopped
  3. 3. ANA Sam Steel stopped
  4. 4. ARI Conor Garland scored
  5. 5. ANA Ondrej Kase scored
  6. 6. ARI Phil Kessel stopped
  7. 7. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  8. 8. ARI Christian Dvorak scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:17ANAOndrej Kase: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 6:48ARIMichael Grabner: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 12:12ARIChristian Fischer: Interference2 min
  4. P2 12:12ANARickard Rakell: Embellishment2 min
  5. P2 0:00ARIBarrett Hayton: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 11:22ARIJakob Chychrun: Tripping2 min
  7. OT 2:41ANAMax Jones: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stepan won the faceoff against Grant
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAARI
34Shots on goal28
2.4Expected goals2.5
66Shot attempts47
31Faceoffs won20
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
27Hits26
10Blocked shots19
14Giveaways14
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Rakell – Terry10:23

    xG 0.57–0.43 (57%)attempts 16–9goals 2–1

  2. Henrique – Silfverberg – Jones10:23

    xG 0.39–0.35 (53%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Grant – Deslauriers – Rowney11:40

    xG 0.03–0.22 (13%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Ritchie – Kase – Steel10:36

    xG 0.56–0.87 (39%)attempts 16–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Larsson13:41

    xG 0.50–0.14 (77%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  2. Holzer – Lindholm2:43

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Holzer – Guhle9:23

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Grabner – Fischer9:11

    xG 0.53–0.36 (59%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Kessel – Schmaltz – Keller13:35

    xG 0.78–0.62 (56%)attempts 15–20goals 0–2

  3. Stepan – Hinostroza – Dvorak9:53

    xG 0.55–0.42 (57%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1

  4. Soderberg – Garland – Hayton8:57

    xG 0.09–0.23 (27%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOesterle – Lyubushkin13:11

    xG 0.71–0.10 (88%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  2. Goligoski – Chychrun18:39

    xG 0.75–0.37 (67%)attempts 17–16goals 1–0

  3. Demers – Ekman-Larsson14:17

    xG 0.54–1.17 (32%)attempts 7–25goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.5 xGANA 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #103 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.54 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).