Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 14, 2019·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Vancouver Canucks 2, San Jose Sharks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 65% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN07012216235
SJS1120738427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:50SJSTomas HertlAssists: Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P3 7:09SJSTimo MeierAssists: Evander Kane, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P3 7:57VANJake VirtanenAssists: Adam Gaudette, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:39SJSEvander KaneENGWGAssists: Logan Couture, Barclay Goodrow · Wrist, 0.64 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:31VANBo HorvatAssists: Quinn Hughes, Brock Boeser · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:52SJSLogan CoutureENAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.61 xG2–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:32VANTroy Stecher: Interference2 min
  2. P1 16:23SJSMario Ferraro: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 18:53SJSTim Heed: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 11:50VANJake Virtanen: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 11:50SJSBrenden Dillon: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 12:41VANTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 12:34SJSKevin Labanc: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Goodrow
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSJS
35Shots on goal27
3.1Expected goals4.0
70Shot attempts56
35Faceoffs won21
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
11Hits13
11Blocked shots20
7Giveaways10
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMiller – Boeser – Pettersson8:10

    xG 0.33–0.10 (77%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Sutter – Beagle – Schaller5:25

    xG 0.21–0.11 (65%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Leivo – Pearson – Horvat12:47

    xG 0.42–0.33 (56%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  4. Roussel – Boeser – Gaudette3:33

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Fantenberg12:01

    xG 0.25–0.04 (85%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Benn – Stecher9:53

    xG 0.52–0.49 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

  3. Myers – Hughes16:10

    xG 0.78–0.77 (50%)attempts 18–17goals 1–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Hertl – Labanc11:17

    xG 0.49–0.18 (73%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  2. Sorensen – Karlsson – Gregor6:27

    xG 0.17–0.20 (45%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Goodrow – Blichfeld10:30

    xG 0.36–0.44 (45%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  4. Couture – Kane – Meier11:25

    xG 0.38–0.65 (37%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHeed – Ferraro11:39

    xG 0.71–0.25 (74%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  2. Burns – Dillon16:45

    xG 0.48–1.05 (32%)attempts 17–28goals 1–0

  3. Vlasic – Karlsson12:50

    xG 0.11–0.69 (14%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 4.0 xGVAN 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #663 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 65% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).