Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 18, 2020·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.

PIT winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR01321409236
PIT2123408524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:41PITBryan RustPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:03PITAnthony AngelloAssists: Sam Lafferty, Marcus Pettersson · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:52PITJason ZuckerPPGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–3
  4. P2 7:11PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Jared McCann · Backhand, 0.19 xG0–4
  5. P2 12:35PITTeddy BluegerAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–5
  6. P2 16:35TORAuston MatthewsAssists: William Nylander, Jake Muzzin · Slap, 0.05 xG1–5
  7. P2 18:01TORKyle CliffordAssists: Jason Spezza, Martin Marincin · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:19PITSam Lafferty: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:27TORDmytro Timashov: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:18TORAlexander Kerfoot: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:26TORJason Spezza: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:43PITAnthony Angello: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 10:24PITBryan Rust: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 14:05PITBryan Rust: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← TOR attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPIT
36Shots on goal24
2.5Expected goals2.3
57Shot attempts39
32Faceoffs won25
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
25Hits28
6Blocked shots9
5Giveaways7
2Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Clifford – Timashov9:22

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Gauthier – Kapanen – Engvall8:11

    xG 0.06–0.04 (57%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Marner – Matthews14:39

    xG 0.74–0.97 (43%)attempts 17–15goals 0–0

  4. Tavares – Kerfoot – Nylander9:45

    xG 0.04–0.30 (11%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Holl17:26

    xG 0.68–0.25 (73%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

  2. Barrie – Dermott2:17

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Barrie – Sandin15:15

    xG 0.27–0.53 (33%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Zucker – Simon13:01

    xG 0.90–0.66 (58%)attempts 16–14goals 0–0

  2. Agozzino – Lafferty – Angello4:07

    xG 0.19–0.04 (82%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  3. Crosby – Hornqvist – Zucker2:08

    xG 0.03–0.00 (86%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Blueger – Simon – Tanev2:15

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Pettersson15:45

    xG 1.00–0.41 (71%)attempts 11–13goals 2–1

  2. Ruhwedel – Riikola10:51

    xG 0.14–0.07 (66%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Letang18:24

    xG 0.29–0.74 (28%)attempts 11–20goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.3 xGTOR 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #448 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.

PIT winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).