Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 22, 2020·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Arizona Coyotes 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 53% of the time.

ARI winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL11021109330
ARI211218312741

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:53TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Alex Killorn, Cameron Gaunce · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:36ARIConor GarlandAssists: Ilya Lyubushkin, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:46ARIClayton KellerAssists: Alex Goligoski, Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:51ARICarl SoderbergPPAssists: Conor Garland, Alex Goligoski · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:45TBLOndrej PalatAssists: Cameron Gaunce, Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:11TBLBrayden PointAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–3
  7. P2 11:04ARIBrad RichardsonGWGAssists: Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:51ARIClayton KellerAssists: Lawson Crouse · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–5
  9. P3 14:28ARIConor GarlandPPAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Taylor Hall · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–6
  10. P3 18:46ARIDerek StepanAssists: Conor Garland, Clayton Keller · Slap, 0.14 xG3–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 3:59TBLMikhail Sergachev: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 16:54TBLCameron Gaunce: Holding2 min
  3. P3 7:17TBLNikita Kucherov: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 7:51ARIJordan Oesterle: Interference2 min
  5. P3 14:09TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P3 14:28TBLCarter Verhaeghe: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Dvorak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLARI
30Shots on goal41
3.3Expected goals3.6
54Shot attempts65
28Faceoffs won33
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
28Hits28
13Blocked shots9
11Giveaways6
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Point15:05

    xG 1.29–0.55 (70%)attempts 18–14goals 1–1

  2. Killorn – Coleman – Cirelli10:34

    xG 0.65–0.34 (65%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Palat – Gourde9:43

    xG 0.68–0.50 (58%)attempts 12–7goals 1–2

  4. Maroon – Gourde – Verhaeghe2:11

    xG 0.09–0.01 (90%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Cernak8:00

    xG 0.54–0.24 (70%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Sergachev9:59

    xG 0.72–0.44 (62%)attempts 10–12goals 1–1

  3. Gaunce – Sergachev7:46

    xG 0.40–0.15 (73%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Garland – Hayton10:24

    xG 0.72–0.21 (77%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  2. Richardson – Soderberg – Hinostroza9:54

    xG 0.23–0.35 (40%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Stepan – Crouse – Keller8:18

    xG 0.41–0.71 (37%)attempts 7–11goals 2–2

  4. Hall – Schmaltz – Dvorak12:51

    xG 0.40–0.71 (36%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Lyubushkin17:11

    xG 0.97–0.70 (58%)attempts 19–12goals 3–0

  2. Goligoski – Ness13:20

    xG 0.88–0.81 (52%)attempts 13–16goals 2–1

  3. Hjalmarsson – Oesterle17:14

    xG 0.38–1.19 (24%)attempts 12–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.6 xGTBL 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARITBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #174 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.67 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 53% of the time.

ARI winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).