Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 24, 2021·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Anaheim Ducks 3, Arizona Coyotes 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 52% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA19211011041335
ARI01006311012428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:48ANAMaxime ComtoisAssists: Jani Hakanpää, Cam Fowler · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:58ANAJosh MahuraAssists: Sam Steel · Snap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:46ANAMax JonesPPAssists: Maxime Comtois, Cam Fowler · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P3 10:05ARITyler PitlickAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Jordan Oesterle · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:49ARIJakob ChychrunAssists: Conor Garland, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:39ARIPhil KesselAssists: Conor Garland, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Snap, 0.07 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ARI Nick Schmaltz stopped
  2. 2. ANA Trevor Zegras scored
  3. 3. ARI Conor Garland scored
  4. 4. ANA Maxime Comtois stopped
  5. 5. ARI Christian Dvorak scored
  6. 6. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:13ANAIsac Lundeström: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 9:44ARIPhil Kessel: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 14:21ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 19:11ANABen Hutton: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 12:01ANAMax Jones: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 12:01ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Schmaltz won the faceoff against Grant
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAARI
35Shots on goal28
3.3Expected goals3.1
68Shot attempts56
30Faceoffs won40
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
33Hits27
16Blocked shots17
5Giveaways6
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Milano – Jones10:42

    xG 0.69–0.23 (75%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Rakell – Comtois – Lundeström9:55

    xG 0.47–0.66 (42%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Silfverberg – Steel – Zegras10:57

    xG 0.16–0.54 (23%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

  4. Grant – Deslauriers – Lettieri7:46

    xG 0.08–0.46 (15%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Hakanpää18:23

    xG 0.51–0.33 (61%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  2. Hutton – Larsson16:35

    xG 0.52–0.71 (42%)attempts 14–17goals 0–2

  3. Shattenkirk – Mahura11:57

    xG 0.23–1.13 (17%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestSchmaltz – Garland – Keller7:47

    xG 0.84–0.04 (96%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  2. Schmaltz – Keller – Caggiula5:18

    xG 0.49–0.06 (89%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Kessel – Dvorak – Crouse6:20

    xG 0.20–0.15 (57%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Pitlick – Crouse2:40

    xG 0.06–0.04 (59%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Chychrun12:48

    xG 1.35–0.34 (80%)attempts 19–11goals 1–2

  2. Hjalmarsson – Oesterle8:39

    xG 0.24–0.14 (62%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – Lyubushkin8:25

    xG 0.20–0.14 (60%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.1 xGANA 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #116 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.84 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 52% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).