Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 17, 2021·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Colorado Avalanche 4, Vancouver Canucks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11207311430
VAN01211517234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:17COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Cale Makar, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:52VANConor GarlandAssists: Jason Dickinson, Tucker Poolman · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:30VANTucker PoolmanAssists: Tyler Motte, Juho Lammikko · Snap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:19COLNazem KadriPPAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:12COLCale MakarPPGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Nazem Kadri · Slap, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:49COLGabriel LandeskogENAssists: Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.71 xG4–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:56VANVasily Podkolzin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:12COLNicolas Aube-Kubel: Interference2 min
  3. P2 2:05COLTyson Jost: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 17:35VANBo Horvat: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 18:06VANTyler Motte: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 18:10COLNazem Kadri: Interference2 min
  7. P3 1:39VANAlex Chiasson: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 2:19VANJ.T. Miller: Roughing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 2:19COLMikko Rantanen: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 3:02VANQuinn Hughes: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
48% to win52% to win
← COL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Rantanen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLVAN
30Shots on goal34
3.0Expected goals2.9
66Shot attempts67
29Faceoffs won35
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
25Hits22
24Blocked shots23
4Giveaways7
11Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Kadri – Nichushkin – Aube-Kubel2:44

    xG 0.03–0.02 (57%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Landeskog – Burakovsky – Rantanen3:54

    xG 0.08–0.11 (44%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Aube-Kubel – Jost – Newhook7:00

    xG 0.21–0.31 (41%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  4. Landeskog – Rantanen – O'Connor7:13

    xG 0.19–0.36 (35%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:46

    xG 0.48–0.32 (60%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Girard2:29

    xG 0.06–0.06 (49%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Murray – Girard3:10

    xG 0.08–0.17 (31%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMiller – Boeser – Pettersson14:05

    xG 0.98–0.19 (84%)attempts 20–15goals 0–0

  2. Dickinson – Garland – Podkolzin9:41

    xG 0.52–0.29 (64%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Chiasson – Motte – Lammikko6:08

    xG 0.20–0.03 (86%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  4. Pearson – Horvat – Hoglander9:52

    xG 0.36–0.25 (59%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – Hughes15:21

    xG 1.00–0.33 (75%)attempts 21–15goals 0–0

  2. Poolman – Hughes2:51

    xG 0.38–0.06 (87%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  3. Myers – Ekman-Larsson9:43

    xG 0.42–0.22 (66%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.9 xGCOL 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #663 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).