Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 17, 2021·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 92% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF051101501221
PIT12111001512348

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:53PITEvan RodriguesPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:45PITBrock McGinnAssists: Mike Matheson, Teddy Blueger · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:35BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Casey Fitzgerald, John Hayden · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P3 14:42BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Rasmus Asplund, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. OT 2:53PITJeff CarterGWGAssists: Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:21BUFRasmus Dahlin: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:17BUFTage Thompson: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:17PITZachary Aston-Reese: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:17BUFTage Thompson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 15:25PITDominik Simon: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 4:09BUFCasey Fitzgerald: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 4:09PITSam Lafferty: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 4:23BUFColin Miller: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 17:07PITMarcus Pettersson: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 17:22BUFTage Thompson: Holding2 min
  11. P3 19:55PITJeff Carter: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jankowski won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
21Shots on goal48
1.6Expected goals4.7
38Shot attempts77
25Faceoffs won30
3Power plays4
18Penalty minutes16
32Hits28
12Blocked shots8
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – Girgensons – Hayden11:29

    xG 0.81–0.35 (70%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Okposo – Asplund – Thompson5:52

    xG 0.19–0.11 (63%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

  3. Eakin – Skinner – Hinostroza5:59

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Eakin – Hinostroza – Asplund4:55

    xG 0.02–0.30 (5%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Fitzgerald – Bryson12:50

    xG 0.46–0.48 (49%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  2. Pysyk – Miller12:12

    xG 0.26–0.89 (23%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Dahlin16:17

    xG 0.13–0.84 (13%)attempts 8–18goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestBlueger – McGinn – Aston-Reese11:43

    xG 0.52–0.06 (90%)attempts 12–4goals 1–1

  2. Carter – Zucker – Heinen11:01

    xG 0.45–0.07 (86%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Lafferty – Simon – O'Connor7:03

    xG 0.54–0.32 (63%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  4. Crosby – Kapanen – Rodrigues13:01

    xG 0.70–0.64 (52%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Ruhwedel13:08

    xG 1.17–0.31 (79%)attempts 20–7goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Marino14:57

    xG 0.84–0.06 (93%)attempts 20–4goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Dumoulin18:18

    xG 0.63–0.55 (53%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.7 xGBUF 1.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #500 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.63 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 92% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).