Sat, Jan 15, 2022·Gila River Arena, Glendale
Colorado Avalanche 5, Arizona Coyotes 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 73% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL | 110 | 314 | 18 | 532 |
| ARI | 06 | 07 | 07 | 020 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 13:13COLNathan MacKinnonPPGWGAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Cale Makar · Backhand, 0.24 xG1–0
- P2 10:49COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–0
- P2 12:11COLNazem KadriAssists: Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–0
- P2 14:30COLMikko RantanenUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–0
- P3 19:39COLNathan MacKinnonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–0
Penalties (6)
- P1 3:15ARIPhil Kessel: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P1 4:20COLMikko Rantanen: Interference2 min
- P1 11:11ARIAlex Galchenyuk: Slashing2 min
- P1 12:17ARIJ.J. Moser: High sticking2 min · PPG
- P1 15:26COLKurtis MacDermid: Interference2 min
- P2 17:49ARIAntoine Roussel: Misconduct10 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Larsson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Colorado Avalanche
Forward lines
- bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:31
xG 0.93–0.24 (79%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0
- Jost – Maltsev – O'Connor8:38
xG 0.18–0.15 (53%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Compher – Aube-Kubel – Newhook6:12
xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0
- Kadri – Burakovsky – Nichushkin6:42
xG 0.25–0.59 (30%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGirard – Makar3:28
xG 0.34–0.02 (94%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0
- Johnson – Girard6:17
xG 0.33–0.09 (79%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0
- Johnson – Toews3:39
xG 0.26–0.09 (73%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestKessel – Larsson – Crouse11:14
xG 0.60–0.15 (81%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0
- Nash – Roussel – Fischer6:47
xG 0.57–0.30 (66%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0
- Ladd – Kessel – Larsson2:20
xG 0.00–0.00 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0
- Ladd – Boyd – Keller11:02
xG 0.26–0.55 (33%)attempts 6–12goals 0–2
Defence pairs
- bestMayo – Lyubushkin3:14
xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Soderstrom – Kolyachonok13:17
xG 0.79–0.71 (53%)attempts 9–13goals 0–2
- Gostisbehere – Mayo15:21
xG 0.41–0.75 (36%)attempts 11–20goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 73% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ARI − COL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).