Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 20, 2022·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Arizona Coyotes 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 79% of the time.

ARI winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI2171110814440
ARI01011121202335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:42CHIJake McCabeAssists: Jonathan Toews, Dominik Kubalik · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:32CHIDominik KubalikAssists: Tyler Johnson, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P2 12:43ARIBarrett HaytonAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Andrew Ladd · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:25CHIAlex VlasicAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:42ARINate SmithAssists: Phil Kessel, Alex Galchenyuk · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:43ARIAnton StralmanAssists: Phil Kessel, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:23CHIAlex DeBrincatGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Seth Jones · Snap, 0.22 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:55ARITravis Boyd: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:01ARICam Dineen: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 12:28CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 5:58ARIAnton Stralman: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 18:53CHISam Lafferty: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 18:53ARIMichael Carcone: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 4:07ARIAlex Galchenyuk: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 12:15ARIJack McBain: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 12:15CHIAlec Regula: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 16:15ARITravis Boyd: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Hayton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIARI
40Shots on goal35
4.6Expected goals2.4
76Shot attempts58
36Faceoffs won23
5Power plays1
9Penalty minutes17
27Hits24
11Blocked shots17
9Giveaways16
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestLafferty – Raddysh – Kurashev7:07

    xG 0.70–0.09 (88%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Johnson – Kubalik9:37

    xG 0.86–0.46 (65%)attempts 14–15goals 2–0

  3. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat12:50

    xG 0.79–0.54 (60%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  4. Lafferty – Katchouk – Johnson2:29

    xG 0.08–0.06 (58%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Vlasic12:33

    xG 1.12–0.15 (88%)attempts 16–6goals 2–0

  2. McCabe – Regula15:40

    xG 0.71–0.44 (62%)attempts 18–16goals 1–0

  3. McCabe – Jones2:18

    xG 0.02–0.01 (58%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRoussel – Boyd – McBain4:57

    xG 0.16–0.01 (91%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Ladd – Schmaltz – Hayton7:32

    xG 0.23–0.25 (48%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

  3. Roussel – Galchenyuk – McBain2:33

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0

  4. Kessel – Galchenyuk – Carcone2:00

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stralman – Moser13:11

    xG 0.47–0.45 (51%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1

  2. Dineen – Kolyachonok10:41

    xG 0.39–0.56 (41%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Capobianco14:56

    xG 0.49–1.52 (24%)attempts 10–22goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.4 xGCHI 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARICHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #175 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.19 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 79% of the time.

ARI winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).