Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 15, 2022·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Dallas Stars 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 65% of the time.

TBL winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
DAL11021011002432
TBL1921411015538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:20TBLRoss ColtonAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Philippe Myers · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:45DALMason MarchmentPPAssists: Jason Robertson, Roope Hintz · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:47TBLNick PaulPPAssists: Corey Perry, Ross Colton · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:02DALJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Miro Heiskanen, Jamie Benn · Deflected, 0.21 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:57DALJason RobertsonAssists: Joe Pavelski, Miro Heiskanen · Snap, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P2 14:23TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ian Cole, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:55TBLIan ColeAssists: Nick Paul, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:18DALRadek FaksaSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:43TBLAlex KillornGWGAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 13:37TBLNick Perbix: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 3:12DALRadek Faksa: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:21TBLNick Paul: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:35DALWyatt Johnston: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:35TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P2 10:51DALNils Lundkvist: Holding2 min
  7. P2 16:20DALNils Lundkvist: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 3:55DALMason Marchment: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  9. P3 14:57DALJoel Kiviranta: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
49% to win51% to win
← DAL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Pavelski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALTBL
32Shots on goal38
3.6Expected goals4.6
53Shot attempts67
37Faceoffs won39
2Power plays5
12Penalty minutes6
43Hits36
16Blocked shots10
7Giveaways19
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBenn – Dellandrea – Johnston7:57

    xG 0.93–0.43 (68%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  2. Pavelski – Hintz – Robertson11:52

    xG 0.74–0.50 (59%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  3. Glendening – Faksa – Kiviranta6:39

    xG 0.20–0.06 (77%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. Seguin – Marchment – Blümel9:58

    xG 0.36–0.69 (34%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Lundkvist11:00

    xG 0.73–0.51 (59%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Heiskanen3:56

    xG 0.09–0.05 (65%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Heiskanen – Lundkvist2:29

    xG 0.21–0.24 (46%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Point – Hagel12:49

    xG 1.07–0.65 (62%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  2. Perry – Namestnikov – Colton8:18

    xG 0.48–0.38 (56%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Maroon – Bellemare – Koepke4:57

    xG 0.05–0.02 (68%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Stamkos – Paul8:52

    xG 0.63–0.80 (44%)attempts 9–11goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Hedman15:40

    xG 1.15–0.60 (65%)attempts 12–14goals 2–0

  2. Fleury – Myers7:33

    xG 0.39–0.25 (61%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Hedman – Perbix3:00

    xG 0.06–0.21 (23%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.6 xGDAL 3.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #62 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.76 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 65% of the time.

TBL winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).