Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 4, 2022·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

San Jose Sharks 3, Buffalo Sabres 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 88% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS21306110329
BUF115313210638

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:19BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Dylan Cozens · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:40SJSNick BoninoAssists: Luke Kunin, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:19SJSKevin LabancPPAssists: Matt Benning, Matt Nieto · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:16BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:21BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Henri Jokiharju · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:45BUFJack QuinnPPGWGAssists: Victor Olofsson, Rasmus Dahlin · Slap, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:23BUFJack QuinnAssists: Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–5
  8. P3 11:52SJSOskar LindblomAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Logan Couture · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P3 16:37BUFAlex TuchENAssists: Jeff Skinner, Tage Thompson · Snap, 0.67 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:33SJSEvgeny Svechnikov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:39SJSKevin Labanc: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:50BUFDylan Cozens: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 0:33SJSTimo Meier: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 12:09SJSAlexander Barabanov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  6. P3 0:00BUFDylan Cozens: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← SJS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBUF
29Shots on goal38
2.2Expected goals5.0
44Shot attempts62
33Faceoffs won25
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
19Hits9
14Blocked shots10
5Giveaways2
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Hertl – Labanc – Svechnikov3:14

    xG 0.01–0.10 (8%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  2. Lindblom – Lorentz – Gadjovich6:26

    xG 0.15–0.34 (31%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Bonino – Svechnikov – Kunin9:09

    xG 0.25–0.60 (29%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  4. Hertl – Labanc – Meier8:49

    xG 0.38–0.76 (33%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Vlasic – Benning13:02

    xG 0.40–0.78 (34%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

  2. Simek – Cicek13:30

    xG 0.22–0.76 (22%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  3. Karlsson – Megna17:55

    xG 0.84–1.78 (32%)attempts 11–18goals 1–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka12:39

    xG 1.78–0.39 (82%)attempts 15–5goals 2–0

  2. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson11:58

    xG 1.23–0.37 (77%)attempts 18–13goals 1–0

  3. Olofsson – Mittelstadt – Krebs3:00

    xG 0.04–0.15 (21%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  4. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs8:02

    xG 0.13–0.24 (35%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin13:56

    xG 1.21–0.57 (68%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Jokiharju – Power18:31

    xG 0.99–0.64 (61%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  3. Fitzgerald – Bryson12:47

    xG 0.67–0.55 (55%)attempts 13–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 5.0 xGSJS 2.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #363 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.52 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 88% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).