Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 9, 2022·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT061821712433
BUF0132111700331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 15:36PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Jeff Petry · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 18:08BUFVictor OlofssonAssists: Tyson Jost, Casey Mittelstadt · Snap, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:15BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:53PITRickard RakellAssists: Danton Heinen · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P3 16:30PITBrock McGinnAssists: Kasperi Kapanen, Jan Rutta · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:30BUFKyle OkposoPPAssists: Jack Quinn, Casey Mittelstadt · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:36PITJeff CarterPPGWGAssists: Rickard Rakell, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.17 xG4–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 16:40BUFTyson Jost: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 7:03BUFJacob Bryson: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 8:55PITJason Zucker: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 14:20BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:12BUFHenri Jokiharju: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 4:15PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 9:51PITSidney Crosby: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 16:58PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 19:38BUFJeff Skinner: Slashing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 19:38PITJake Guentzel: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 19:38BUFJeff Skinner: Match penalty5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Cozens
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
33Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals2.5
56Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won19
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes15
19Hits13
11Blocked shots13
6Giveaways6
11Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – McGinn – Kapanen8:11

    xG 0.26–0.18 (59%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Archibald – Blueger – Heinen5:01

    xG 0.41–0.40 (50%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Zucker – Rust8:41

    xG 0.21–0.25 (45%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rakell – Guentzel13:32

    xG 0.31–0.55 (36%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Pettersson17:01

    xG 0.70–0.42 (62%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Ruhwedel – Joseph8:15

    xG 0.40–0.16 (71%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Dumoulin – Rutta15:21

    xG 0.46–1.16 (28%)attempts 10–16goals 2–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Jost – Mittelstadt6:24

    xG 0.56–0.12 (82%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson11:50

    xG 0.83–0.47 (64%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  3. Cozens – Quinn – Peterka8:26

    xG 0.28–0.28 (50%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs8:10

    xG 0.17–0.42 (29%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin13:59

    xG 0.83–0.47 (64%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Jokiharju – Samuelsson2:40

    xG 0.07–0.01 (88%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Fitzgerald – Bryson4:14

    xG 0.27–0.37 (43%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGPIT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #96 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.97 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).