Sat, Dec 10, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh
Buffalo Sabres 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | 09 | 012 | 117 | 138 |
| PIT | 212 | 010 | 19 | 331 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 4:22PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
- P1 6:51PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Jake Guentzel, Brian Dumoulin · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
- P3 11:00BUFPeyton KrebsAssists: Casey Fitzgerald, Zemgus Girgensons · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
- P3 18:22PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Jake Guentzel, Bryan Rust · Snap, 0.08 xG1–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 1:01BUFTage Thompson: Hooking2 min
- P1 3:21BUFVictor Olofsson: High sticking2 min · PPG
- P1 12:26PITJake Guentzel: Interference2 min
- P1 16:16PITBrian Dumoulin: Interference2 min
- P3 5:28PITKris Letang: Holding2 min
- P3 19:59BUFRasmus Dahlin: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Cozens
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka12:37
xG 0.75–0.37 (67%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1
- Tuch – Thompson – Mittelstadt11:53
xG 0.62–0.30 (67%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1
- Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs8:02
xG 0.30–0.42 (41%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0
- Olofsson – Asplund – Jost9:21
xG 0.45–1.10 (29%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSamuelsson – Dahlin9:38
xG 0.78–0.17 (82%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0
- Dahlin – Power10:09
xG 0.63–0.15 (81%)attempts 15–2goals 0–1
- Fitzgerald – Bryson3:51
xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestMalkin – Zucker – Rust7:11
xG 0.58–0.24 (70%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0
- Carter – Zucker – Kapanen2:05
xG 0.41–0.10 (80%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1
- Archibald – Blueger – Poehling9:09
xG 0.48–0.44 (52%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
- Malkin – Rust – McGinn2:06
xG 0.03–0.07 (30%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestPetry – Pettersson13:38
xG 0.85–0.40 (68%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0
- Dumoulin – Rutta14:43
xG 0.90–0.64 (58%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0
- Letang – Joseph16:13
xG 0.40–1.10 (27%)attempts 8–20goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).