Tue, Feb 28, 2023·Mullett Arena, Tempe
Chicago Blackhawks 1, Arizona Coyotes 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 08 | 08 | 18 | 124 |
| ARI | 213 | 114 | 16 | 433 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 10:07ARITravis BoydUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
- P1 18:37ARIBarrett HaytonGWGAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Clayton Keller · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–2
- P2 15:32ARIJack McBainAssists: Troy Stecher, Matias Maccelli · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–3
- P3 8:39ARINick SchmaltzAssists: Clayton Keller, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.05 xG0–4
- P3 18:31CHIAndreas AthanasiouAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Isaak Phillips · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–4
Penalties (5)
- P1 3:48ARIClayton Keller: Hooking2 min
- P1 13:31CHIJarred Tinordi: Roughing2 min
- P1 13:31ARIJack McBain: Fighting5 min
- P1 13:31CHIJarred Tinordi: Fighting5 min
- P2 0:00ARITroy Stecher: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Hayton won the faceoff against Domi
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- Dickinson – Katchouk – Gust9:42
xG 0.25–0.27 (48%)attempts 11–7goals 0–2
- Khaira – Dickinson – Anderson2:00
xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0
- Athanasiou – Domi – Kurashev12:48
xG 0.62–0.85 (42%)attempts 14–16goals 1–1
- Johnson – Khaira – Anderson2:34
xG 0.00–0.27 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJones – Mitchell2:34
xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Murphy – Phillips3:20
xG 0.16–0.03 (86%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Jones – Englund3:22
xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestSchmaltz – Keller – Hayton12:35
xG 0.78–0.15 (84%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0
- Boyd – Ritchie – Fischer9:03
xG 0.71–0.29 (71%)attempts 10–11goals 1–1
- Crouse – McBain – Maccelli12:37
xG 0.76–0.37 (67%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0
- Kassian – O'Brien – Dauphin9:34
xG 0.05–0.56 (8%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestStecher – Soderstrom14:17
xG 1.03–0.25 (80%)attempts 16–11goals 1–1
- Gostisbehere – Välimäki17:14
xG 1.08–0.37 (75%)attempts 19–8goals 2–0
- Nemeth – Moser14:29
xG 0.24–0.60 (29%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ARI − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).